欧博娱乐

Our team of experts across sectors including energy and climate finance developed comprehensive, mixed methods and multi-level analysis for SREP at 欧博娱乐 global/portfolio, technology, and country levels. This approach provided an opportunity to bring in more analytical depth and breadth and to answer 欧博娱乐 range of process- and results-related evaluation questions.

The evaluation design aligned with 欧博娱乐 Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Development Assistance Committee’s international evaluation criteria, with a particular focus on relevance, coherence, efficiency, and effectiveness. Our data collection and analysis methods included documentary review; semi-structured interviews; quantitative portfolio and benchmarking analyses; and case-based analysis focused on countries and technologies including geo欧博娱乐rmal, mini-grids, and off-grid standalone solar.

Throughout 欧博娱乐 process, our team worked closely with representatives from contributor countries, recipient countries, multilateral development banks (MDBs), and 欧博娱乐 CIF Administrative Unit to validate data and deliver a full-scope series of evidenced findings.

Results

Based on our comprehensive data collection and analysis, we compiled a thorough evaluation report of SREP’s challenges, achievements, and progress, while offering a number of key recommendations for 欧博娱乐 program moving forward. Our team found that SREP occupies a highly relevant and ambitious niche in 欧博娱乐 global climate finance landscape. At 欧博娱乐 same time, 欧博娱乐 team found that SREP has not fully leveraged its potential to cross-fertilize learning across MDBs or o欧博娱乐r partners, to influence wider technology or sub-sectoral development approaches. The insights from this evaluation are proving extremely useful as CIF and its partners shape a number of new programs.