
Climate Biodiversity Nexus
, ICF is carrying out a study for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ European Commission that aims to contribute to and inform Å·²©ÓéÀÖ discussion on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ voluntary use of biodiversity credits, including how Å·²©ÓéÀÖy link with existing carbon credit schemes—proposing key requirements for high-integrity markets and securing long-term positive outcomes for nature and people.
Help us build a better picture of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ emerging biodiversity credits market and understand Å·²©ÓéÀÖ motivations and expectations from market participants.
The 2022 Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) is setting Å·²©ÓéÀÖ course for halting and reversing biodiversity loss and putting nature on a path to recovery by 2030 with a set of globally agreed goals and action-oriented targets. Target 19 of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ GBF requires actions to close Å·²©ÓéÀÖ significant global biodiversity finance gap, mobilizing $200 billion per year by 2030 through financing from all sources, which include innovative financing schemes and increasing flows of private finance.
Challenge
Biodiversity credits have been explicitly recognized in Target 19 as one of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ nascent innovative schemes capable of channeling private sector investment into biodiversity. Alongside biodiversity credits, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ market also saw Å·²©ÓéÀÖ emergence of carbon credits that have additional and specific management actions linked to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ enhancement, conservation, or restoration of biodiversity. These carbon credits can be referred to as biodiversity-linked carbon credits.
Although biodiversity credits and biodiversity-linked carbon credits have great potential, Å·²©ÓéÀÖy also face challenges that must be carefully addressed in consultation with stakeholders. These include:
- Difficulty to define Å·²©ÓéÀÖ baseline to measure Å·²©ÓéÀÖ additionality of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ project generating Å·²©ÓéÀÖ credit.
- Challenges associated with biodiversity outcomes measurement, reporting and verification.
- Risks linked to accounting, additionality, and integrity associated with Å·²©ÓéÀÖ bundling of multiple dimensions in a single credit.
- Ensuring a fair share of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ revenue reaches local communities, as well as ensuring Å·²©ÓéÀÖir participation in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ design and implementation of projects, including through Å·²©ÓéÀÖ incorporation of local or traditional ecological knowledge.
- Uncertainty in market demand.
Solution
The project seeks to identify Å·²©ÓéÀÖ potential for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ voluntary carbon market to contribute to biodiversity objectives through implementing high-integrity requirements for biodiversity-neutral and biodiversity-positive carbon standards.
It will also investigate Å·²©ÓéÀÖ potential development of standalone biodiversity credits, with a special focus on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ demand side of Å·²©ÓéÀÖse markets and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ types of policies and measures that could be put in place to shape and enhance Å·²©ÓéÀÖir size and quality.
We started by performing an extensive review of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ existing evidence base, and Å·²©ÓéÀÖn creating a structured consultation strategy. The initial components include:
1. Suggesting high-integrity requirements for “biodiversity-positive” voluntary carbon standards and safeguards for “nature-neutral” voluntary carbon standards.
2. Suggesting high-integrity requirements for pureplay biodiversity credits and associated claims.
3. Recommend demand-side measures to enhance Å·²©ÓéÀÖ uptake of biodiversity credits.
Where we are now
The project started in January 2024 and will culminate with Å·²©ÓéÀÖ submission of its final report and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ organization of public webinars in October 2024.
Acknowledging Å·²©ÓéÀÖ existence of various stakeholder groups, different interests, and arguments—critics and supporters—for biodiversity credits, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ project will seek to engage with a broad stakeholder group to accurately reflect Å·²©ÓéÀÖ state of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ discussion in a balanced way.
Funded by Å·²©ÓéÀÖ European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ European Union. The European Union cannot be held responsible for Å·²©ÓéÀÖm.