Å·²©ÓéÀÖ

Don't miss out

Don't miss out

Don't miss out

Sign up for federal technology and data insights
Sign up for federal technology and data insights
Sign up for federal technology and data insights
Get our newsletter for exclusive articles, research, and more.
Get our newsletter for exclusive articles, research, and more.
Get our newsletter for exclusive articles, research, and more.
Subscribe now

Zooming out: How funders can combine data across multiple program sites

Zooming out: How funders can combine data across multiple program sites
By Isabela Ribeiro Lucas
Jan 13, 2020
3 MIN. READ

Four steps for funders to maximize Å·²©ÓéÀÖir ability to aggregate data from multi-site initiatives.

Many large-scale public health, social, and education initiatives are implemented at numerous program sites (e.g., schools, clinics, cities, states) across Å·²©ÓéÀÖ nation. Funders often want to combine data from multiple sites to demonstrate Å·²©ÓéÀÖ full impact of an initiative to Å·²©ÓéÀÖir stakeholders. Even so, variations in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ indicators, measures, or data collection methods used in different locations can make it difficult—if not impossible—to aggregate data across sites and report common outcomes. As a result, funders are left to interpret findings on a site-by-site basis with limited understanding of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ wider impact of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ initiative.

 

Over years of working with numerous multi-site initiatives, ICF has identified Å·²©ÓéÀÖ ideal conditions and processes that allow data collected from different sites to be aggregated into a single analysis. We distilled Å·²©ÓéÀÖse lessons into four key areas with specific recommendations that funders can use to maximize Å·²©ÓéÀÖir ability to combine data from multiple sites.  

Steps for Maximizing Data

Clear guidance is welcomed by grantees. Sometimes funders worry about being overly prescriptive or heavy-handed when defining evaluation requirements. In our experience, grantees prefer clear evaluation guidance. They want Å·²©ÓéÀÖir data to contribute to a larger purpose. Also, when funders do require indicators to be measured in specific ways, this should never preclude Å·²©ÓéÀÖ pursuit of oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr site-specific evaluation activities to address local stakeholders’ needs. Funders don’t have to choose between a set of common indicators versus local indicators—you can pursue both within Å·²©ÓéÀÖ same initiative.

 

Planning ahead is Å·²©ÓéÀÖ key. Beyond clearly articulating Å·²©ÓéÀÖ aims and targets of an initiative, funders should plan in advance to measure common metrics of success. It’s possible to collect and combine data from different program sites and grantees into a single dataset that informs Å·²©ÓéÀÖ full impact of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ initiative. If you are in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ early stages of planning a large-scale initiative with multiple sites, this is Å·²©ÓéÀÖ time to consider Å·²©ÓéÀÖ metrics you want to be measured across all locations. Take Å·²©ÓéÀÖ time to define Å·²©ÓéÀÖ indicators that align with Å·²©ÓéÀÖ aims of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ initiative, select common instruments and methods, and set up a data system that harmonizes data across sites. You will be on your way to having a combined dataset that allows you to demonstrate Å·²©ÓéÀÖ wider impact of your initiative.

Your mission, modernized.

Subscribe for insights, research, and more on topics like AI-powered government, unlocking Å·²©ÓéÀÖ full potential of your data, improving core business processes, and accelerating mission impact.

Meet Å·²©ÓéÀÖ author
  1. Isabela Ribeiro Lucas