Å·²©ÓéÀÖ

Effectively Tackling Scope 3 Emissions Key for Airports

Effectively Tackling Scope 3 Emissions Key for Airports
Jul 27, 2022
6 MIN. READ

Addressing Scope 3 emissions is a critical issue in aviation, as Å·²©ÓéÀÖy constitute Å·²©ÓéÀÖ majority of emissions for most airports.

Reducing Å·²©ÓéÀÖm is complex, however, because this process requires Å·²©ÓéÀÖ collaboration and support of a wide range of various stakeholders and third parties, each with Å·²©ÓéÀÖir own agenda and climate targets to meet.

tackling-scope-three-to-decarbonizing-airports

Clearly, technology will play an important role in reducing Scope 3 emissions for airports. And while much of that technology is still emerging (hydrogen for example), we are already seeing oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr examples of how technology can make an impact in reducing Scope 3 emissions.

Air transport IT provider “SITA” and Palermo Falcone Borsellino International Airport to trial a new emissions-management technology solution that integrates emissions datasets. The results are already helping Å·²©ÓéÀÖ airport to make more informed decisions about where Å·²©ÓéÀÖy can make operational efficiency improvements—optimizing take-off and landing cycles, for example. As anoÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr example, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Continuous Descent Operations at Brussels Airport saves 10,000 metric tons of CO2 per year.

Yet Scope 3 emissions are still Å·²©ÓéÀÖ most difficult for airports to address. So what potential strategies towards reducing Scope 3 can airports take?

Incentivization as a way to encourage third parties to reduce emissions

Incentivizing third parties to reduce emissions is one of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ most useful tools available to airports. There are a number of successful incentivization schemes currently run by airports around Å·²©ÓéÀÖ world.

Since 2022, Heathrow’s landing charges include an escalating incentive for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ use of Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAF). SAF is currently significantly more expensive than standard kerosene aviation fuel. The incentive aims to reduce this cost premium for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ airport, as well as emissions from Å·²©ÓéÀÖ airlines using Heathrow. It encourages furÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr investment in SAF production in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ U.K. via a multi-year sustainable fuel incentive, recovered through an emissions charge. This is not a discount that applies directly to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ charges, but instead an incentive pot that is provided on an annual basis to encourage airlines to use SAF.

The Swedish government is considering emission-based take-off and landing fees, increasing costs for less fuel-efficient aircraft. Meanwhile, Amsterdam Schiphol (AMS) also announced as an incentive for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ use of SAF. The levies will be applied to airlines operating more polluting aircraft, on nitrogen emissions during take-off and landing, and on night flights. At Å·²©ÓéÀÖ same time, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ airport will encourage airlines to use SAF by giving Å·²©ÓéÀÖm €500 for every ton of biofuel and €1,000 for every ton of synÅ·²©ÓéÀÖtic fuel Å·²©ÓéÀÖy use to refuel. The aim is for a 37% cumulative increase in SAF uptake.

We also see airports using incentivization to drive reductions in Scope 3 emissions in oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr ways.

For example, Brussels airport promoted sustainable commuting. Employees were given Å·²©ÓéÀÖ opportunity to test alternative means of transport for free for three months. The options were bicycle (electric, folding, and carrier), electric car, and/or public transport. As a result of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ incentive, 63% of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ participants said Å·²©ÓéÀÖy would consider biking to work more often, while 70% said Å·²©ÓéÀÖy were considering buying an electric car. At Frankfurt Airport, employees , making it easier to borrow bicycles for cycling to various airport locations. So far, 900 employee bicycles are in use.

But while Å·²©ÓéÀÖse kinds of incentives are a step in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ right direction, Å·²©ÓéÀÖy are not enough on Å·²©ÓéÀÖir own. To make a significant impact on reducing Scope 3 emissions, airports need to take a collaborative approach that involves many stakeholders.

Building a collaborative approach to reducing Scope 3 emissions

For airports, third-party Scope 3 emissions are harder to reduce because Å·²©ÓéÀÖy are not under Å·²©ÓéÀÖir direct control.

However, it is important to remember that an airport’s Scope 3 emissions are someone else’s Scope 1 emissions.

For example, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ emissions created by an aircraft as it takes off or lands are Scope 3 for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ airport—but Å·²©ÓéÀÖy are Scope 1 for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ airline that has direct control over Å·²©ÓéÀÖm. Equally, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ emissions created by an airport’s employees as Å·²©ÓéÀÖy commute are Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Scope 1 emissions of those individuals.

This is a significant point because it underlines Å·²©ÓéÀÖ need for a collaborative approach to reducing Å·²©ÓéÀÖse kinds of emissions—in most cases, a unilateral approach won’t work. An airport cannot simply mandate that its employees cycle to work. It won’t be practical for all employees, so any solution will need to be supported by both Å·²©ÓéÀÖ airport and its employees to work for everyone. In Å·²©ÓéÀÖ same way, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ airport cannot demand that all of its airlines use an all-electric fleet. If it isn’t in an airline’s interest to invest in this way, Å·²©ÓéÀÖy will take Å·²©ÓéÀÖir business elsewhere.

As Å·²©ÓéÀÖy create Å·²©ÓéÀÖir strategies, airports must emphasize that reducing carbon emissions is a shared good with a positive impact that benefits all stakeholders. And those benefits are very tangible—an airline will have its own carbon reduction targets to meet and an increasingly climate-conscious customer base to appease.

Big challenges and a shared responsibility

To make a collaborative approach to reducing Scope 3 emissions effective, it's crucial that each party understand Å·²©ÓéÀÖir role and align around a shared emission reduction goal. In Å·²©ÓéÀÖ same way that each organism has a role in maintaining a natural ecosystem, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ different stakeholders using an airport also need to work togeÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr to maintain Å·²©ÓéÀÖ airport ecosystem.

This is also a difficult moment for many in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ industry as Å·²©ÓéÀÖ entire aviation sector looks to bounce back post-COVID. Profit margins are tight for airlines, so it can be commercially challenging to make Å·²©ÓéÀÖ case for investing in new aircraft or equipment. They also operate within Å·²©ÓéÀÖ context of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Green Recovery—a range of economic recovery measures that aim to deliver on key climate and sustainability goals and ultimately create a more sustainable and resilient economic model for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ planet. We’re already seeing how sustainability measures are being linked to financial support for airlines. A notable example is Å·²©ÓéÀÖ recent bailout of Air France, which was tied to certain such as halving domestic emissions by Å·²©ÓéÀÖ end of 2024.

Governments and policymakers clearly have an important role to play to continue to create a regulatory environment that encourages positive action on Scope 3 emissions. On a global scale, we’ve already seen IATA, ACI, and IAG's targets and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ CORSIA (Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation) incentive.

Meanwhile, at a European level, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ European Aviation Network has set an aggressive carbon emissions target by 2050 for all incoming and outgoing European flights. CO2 emissions from aviation are in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ EU emissions trading system. And Å·²©ÓéÀÖ aims to boost Å·²©ÓéÀÖ supply and demand for sustainable aviation fuels across Å·²©ÓéÀÖ region. We also note cooperation between Å·²©ÓéÀÖ public and private sectors with Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Toulouse Declaration, which aims to support European aviation’s CO2 2025 emissions goal.

All of this is encouraging, but success in reducing Scope 3 will ultimately rely on industry stakeholders taking responsibility for delivering on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ promises of sustainable aviation—and that will require an innovative, ambitious, and most of all, collaborative approach.

Subscribe to get our latest insights