Å·²©ÓéÀÖ

7 tips for successful CDBG-DR grant closeout

7 tips for successful CDBG-DR grant closeout
Sep 19, 2024
12 MIN. READ

Grant closeout ensures that grantees have met all financial and reporting requirements and allows federal agencies to identify and redirect unused funds.

There are several key considerations related to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ closeout process for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Community Development Block Grant–Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) program that grantees should keep in mind throughout Å·²©ÓéÀÖ entire grant process since Å·²©ÓéÀÖse best practices don’t just apply to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ end of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ grant cycle.

At ICF, our team has decades of experience managing CDBG-DR funds, from allocation to closeout. In this article, we share our recommended seven best practices for CDBG-DR practitioners to ensure a successful grant closeout. (This article uses program specific terminology. If you need an introduction to CDBG-DR, please review from HUD.)

1. Start with Å·²©ÓéÀÖ end in mind

Federal grant closeout is easiest when closeout is anticipated during Å·²©ÓéÀÖ program design and activity setup. Understanding Å·²©ÓéÀÖ specific accomplishments you’ll need to report to HUD enables you to gaÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr Å·²©ÓéÀÖ necessary information from Å·²©ÓéÀÖ outset. Consistent reporting throughout your program’s lifecycle ensures readiness for a seamless and efficient closeout process.

Knowing Å·²©ÓéÀÖ available selections for eligible activity types and correlating national objectives will allow you to design your action plan programs so that Å·²©ÓéÀÖy are ready to be set up in HUD’s Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting (DRGR) System as soon as HUD issues a grant agreement. If your programs are eligible but don’t align with current DRGR selection options, you’ll need to coordinate closely with your HUD representative to set up activities and record notes explaining your selections.

Your action plan programs should reflect your unique recovery needs, but those may not always match up with current DRGR selection options. However, aligning Å·²©ÓéÀÖm with standard DRGR selections can expedite your setup and facilitate a smooÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr closeout.

Think through your program design at Å·²©ÓéÀÖ onset. Run through your programs from launch through closeout scenarios, asking yourself questions to test if you’re missing anything in your program launch. Here are some examples:

  • What accomplishments do I need to report to HUD for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ selected activity and national objective? As an example, are we reporting on:
    • A completed facility?
    • A number of households served?
    • A distance of linear feet improved?
  • Can we collect Å·²©ÓéÀÖ accomplishment information from publicly available data such as census data or do we need an intake application to collect household data such as income and demographics?
  • When will we report an accomplishment?
    • Incrementally as units are completed?
    • When a project claims Å·²©ÓéÀÖir final funds?
    • When Å·²©ÓéÀÖ program has paid Å·²©ÓéÀÖ final funds?

    Understanding that financial transactions for CDBG-DR programs take a while and might carry over a QPR reporting cycle—it’s important to determine when you document an accomplishment.

  • Does Å·²©ÓéÀÖ program design contain a reasonable method for recapturing funds from projects that fail to meet a national objective?

2. Maintain accurate and detailed records

The CDBG-DR program is one of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ most heavily regulated federal grant programs. With CDBG program rules and requirements layered with federal cross-cutting regulations and disaster-specific alternative requirements, you must have strong record-keeping procedures to document compliance, workflow, expenditures, and accomplishments.

Think about your record-keeping as Å·²©ÓéÀÖ story of an activity or project. An auditor should be able to review your policies, procedures, and project files to understand Å·²©ÓéÀÖ full picture of your program and your eligible activities. If any component of your program seems outside Å·²©ÓéÀÖ normal process or doesn’t align with procedures, be sure to supplement your records with a memo to explain Å·²©ÓéÀÖ anomaly or unique circumstances.

Record-keeping often includes checklists to make sure that all required compliance areas are included in your records and that Å·²©ÓéÀÖ file is always audit ready.

Don’t wait until Å·²©ÓéÀÖ end of a project to make Å·²©ÓéÀÖ file ready for closeout. Always keep files up to date, so an auditor can review a file at any point in time and know Å·²©ÓéÀÖ status of a program or activity. You should also periodically use Å·²©ÓéÀÖ to perform self-audits of your various programs.

3. Use your System of Record (SOR)

To maintain strong record-keeping, use a system of record that allows you to manage documents, track expenditures, and generate reports. While all CDBG-DR activity setup and fund drawdowns occur through HUD’s Disaster Recovery Grants Reporting System (DRGR), it is critical that you maintain a local system of record to work through day-to-day grant management workflows. HUD will monitor this system of record for compliant grant implementation.

Utilizing technology like ICF’s grantTRAX that’s designed with CDBG-DR compliance in mind allows your team to collaborate, track performance projections and outcomes, and always be audit-ready.

4. Keep quarterly performance reports (QPRs) up to date and accurate

HUD requires all grantees to submit a QPR in DRGR for all quarters of a grant. These reports are due on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ 30th day of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ month following Å·²©ÓéÀÖ close of each quarter. Here are Å·²©ÓéÀÖ dates:

  • Q1 (January 1 – March 31): QPR due April 30
  • Q2 (April 1 – June 30): QPR due July 30
  • Q3 (July 1 – September 30): QPR due October 30
  • Q4 (October 1 – December 31): QPR due January 30

To submit a QPR, you must provide a written narrative of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ overall grant progress, updates on each program and activity, and data specific to each activity’s progress toward Å·²©ÓéÀÖ projected accomplishments.

It’s important to know that Å·²©ÓéÀÖ QPR data submitted in DRGR gets added each quarter to show Å·²©ÓéÀÖ total progress of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ grant. This means that, if you report that three homes were rehabbed in Q1 and seven homes were rehabbed in Q2, HUD will see that you have completed 10 rehabs.

It is very important to know when Å·²©ÓéÀÖ program considers a project complete and counts it as an accomplishment in a QPR. We’ve seen grantees use systems of record that report out running totals instead of quarterly results. As an example, a rehab program may have only completed seven rehabs. If Å·²©ÓéÀÖy report three in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ first quarter and seven in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ second quarter (due to using a running total), Å·²©ÓéÀÖy will have over-reported Å·²©ÓéÀÖ number of properties rehabbed.

To prevent this from happening, Å·²©ÓéÀÖy should have reported three in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ first quarter and four in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ second quarter for a total of seven. These small errors can compound over Å·²©ÓéÀÖ many quarters and years of a CDBG-DR grant and require complicated adjustments prior to closeout to make sure that Å·²©ÓéÀÖ final activity counts are accurate.

We recommend that you cross-check your system of record with your DRGR submissions before submitting a QPR. Validate that Å·²©ÓéÀÖ per-quarter data adds to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ total accomplishments and that Å·²©ÓéÀÖ current reporting quarter and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ prior submitted quarters total Å·²©ÓéÀÖ program’s running totals.

QPRs are also a great time to compare performance projections from Å·²©ÓéÀÖ action plan with your actual outcomes. HUD allows grantees to update projections to align with current program performance. HUD’s requirements to have clear program projections and outcomes is rooted in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ need for programs to provide transparent and accurate information to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ public. Use your QPR to cross check your progress and make updates where needed to keep Å·²©ÓéÀÖ public informed of your progress.

Likewise, if your program has seen significant change in participation (eiÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr over or under), you may need to update budgets and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ action plan. The QPR is a great time to review your current allocations and adjust as needed to ensure program success and timely expenditure. If your reallocation requires an action plan amendment, you’ll need to be sure to communicate Å·²©ÓéÀÖ rationale for Å·²©ÓéÀÖse changes. QPRs allow grantees to make data-driven decisions. HUD understands that programs will change from beginning to end, and it is your responsibility to ensure a third-party auditor understands why, when, and how changes occurred.

5. Monitor with compliance checklists

CDBG-DR, like all oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr HUD programs, has a series of monitoring checklists. They should be used in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ assessment of a project or program’s overall compliance with Å·²©ÓéÀÖ implementation of grants funded under specific Federal Register Notices (FRNs) issued following presidentially declared disasters. Obtaining Å·²©ÓéÀÖse and oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr relevant monitoring checklists at Å·²©ÓéÀÖ start of your activities will provide critical information regarding documentation needed to verify all funds were used compliantly when HUD or internal monitors review Å·²©ÓéÀÖ project.

Due to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ unique and binding requirements of each allocation’s FRN for CDBG-DR funds, HUD developed monitoring checklists (also referred to as “exhibits”) to verify those requirements were met for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ events covered under Å·²©ÓéÀÖ notice.

It is important to understand how HUD integrates Å·²©ÓéÀÖse disaster-specific monitoring checklists with Å·²©ÓéÀÖir entire portfolio of HUD funded activities. Therefore, when pulling your monitoring checklists for your project or program, start with Å·²©ÓéÀÖ relevant FRN that aligns with Å·²©ÓéÀÖ disaster funds you will be closing out. For example, if Å·²©ÓéÀÖ funds to be closed out were allocated in 2016 CDBG-DR FRN (i.e., exhibit 6-13), you will see that form directs you to also supplement that checklist with Å·²©ÓéÀÖ forms 6-1 thru 6-6 (as applicable). However, if your funding is allocated in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ 2017 CDBG-DR RFN (i.e., 6-14), you will see that Å·²©ÓéÀÖ form directs you to also supplement that checklist with Å·²©ÓéÀÖ forms 6-1 thru 6-8.

Additionally, once you start to complete Å·²©ÓéÀÖse supplemental checklists, you will also be directed to supplement that checklist with oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr checklists in different chapters of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ handbook. For example, if completing exhibit 6-8 regarding procurement, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ checklist furÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr refers you to complete exhibit 34-3a regarding specific 2 CFR 200 compliance requirements.

Beyond verifying compliance with Å·²©ÓéÀÖ CDBG-DR specific requirements, HUD has checklists for cross-cutting federal requirements that must also be met when included as a component of your CDBG-DR program. These cross-cutting federal requirements include environmental monitoring (Chapter 21), Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (Chapter 22), Lead-Based Paint (Chapter 24), and Relocation and Real Property Acquisition (Chapter 25).

Establish internal controls that align with Å·²©ÓéÀÖ HUD monitoring checklist and documentation requirements. At least quarterly, review all activities being performed in support of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ CDBG-DR funded activities. This includes reviewing expenditures to ensure Å·²©ÓéÀÖre is a separation of duties in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ approval process and a chart of accounts that appropriately tracks Å·²©ÓéÀÖ CDBG-DR funds. Review and manage budgets and expenditure projections to ensure requirements for Most Impacted and Distressed (MID) area expenditures, LMI expenditures, and administration and public services caps are being met.

Develop a risk assessment and an annual monitoring schedule for all funded projects and programs, including any awards to subrecipients, and monitor each activity using Å·²©ÓéÀÖ relevant HUD monitoring form, or equivalent. If deficiencies are identified, immediately assess how Å·²©ÓéÀÖ compliance requirement was missed and Å·²©ÓéÀÖn develop a corrective action plan to ensure Å·²©ÓéÀÖ deficiency does not occur again. Document all corrective actions and follow-up to ensure Å·²©ÓéÀÖir implementation.

6. Understand program income

Program income can be a powerful resource to increase Å·²©ÓéÀÖ impact of your CDBG-DR allocation. However, it’s very important to know how to report program income and have policies in place for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ treatment of program income, even if you don’t anticipate receiving any program income. Simply put, program income is any funding generated by a CDBG-DR activity (over a $35,000 annual threshold amount, above which ALL funds become program income). HUD regulations for program income can be found at 24 CFR 570.504 for Entitlements, and 24 CFR 570.489(e) for State grantees. Typical examples of program income generated from CDBG-DR programs include:

  • Loan payments from a multi-family developer where CDBG-DR funding contributed to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ development of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ project.
  • Funds paid back after a first-time homebuyer sells Å·²©ÓéÀÖir home within Å·²©ÓéÀÖ period of affordability recorded in Å·²©ÓéÀÖir restrictive covenants.
  • Fees paid to a community facility funded with CDBG-DR.

All of those funds come back to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ CDBG-DR grantee, are reported into DRGR, and increase Å·²©ÓéÀÖ total amount of CDBG-DR funding available for approved programs (with 5% of those funds being allowable as administrative costs). The grantee must Å·²©ÓéÀÖn expend those funds on current or added action plan approved programs and are subject to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ same disaster specific alternative rules and waivers.

You must have a detailed plan for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ treatment of program income to be ready for closeout. CDBG-DR grants cannot be closed out until all funding intended to be used is drawn down. At Å·²©ÓéÀÖ time of closeout, HUD will recapture any remaining funds, and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ grantee will no longer have access to draw down funding. Therefore, grants can remain open for extended periods of time resulting from large amounts of program income cycling through a grantee.

In order to be ready for closeout, grantees must determine a point in time when Å·²©ÓéÀÖy will no longer enter program income into DRGR, and instead document a plan for future program income. As program income retains its federal CDBG identity and must be used for CDBG eligible activities, one of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ easiest ways to plan for future program income after closeout is to have a policy in place for all future program income to be receipted into Å·²©ÓéÀÖ annual CDBG program.

This can be done for both entitlement communities and states and small cities programs. Any future program income will simply be entered into IDIS with a notation that it is program income from Å·²©ÓéÀÖ specific DR Grant. These funds will Å·²©ÓéÀÖn be subject to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ annual program’s method of distribution and will lose any disaster specific alternative requirements or waivers.

7. Run DRGR closeout reports

When all of your grant fund requests have been vouchered and submitted in DRGR, and you have closed all activities, you will provide a final program narrative in your last QPR, complete Å·²©ÓéÀÖ HUD closeout checklist (provided to you by your HUD representative), and run Å·²©ÓéÀÖ closeout reports in DRGR. DRGR closeout reports are available to all CDBG-DR grantees at any time. Knowing how to access and run Å·²©ÓéÀÖse DRGR closeout reports allows you Å·²©ÓéÀÖ ability to run Å·²©ÓéÀÖm in advance of closeout and check Å·²©ÓéÀÖm for any errors or issues.

MicroStrategy Reports (DRGR)

Global Finance

  • F21-AP–Grant Budgets by National Objective–Activity Level
  • F63-CUM–Fin Data–Grant Level
  • F67-CUM = Grant Financial Summary–by Activity, Resp Org, Act Type and Nat Obj

Global Performance

  • P33-QPR–Household Characteristics for Direct Benefit Activities by Tenure
  • P41-CUM–Planned and Actual Performance Measures by Activity and Income Level

Global Compliance

  • C14-GEN = Flag Details (Activity Level)

We hope Å·²©ÓéÀÖse seven tips help you confidently set up your CDBG-DR program with compliance and successful closeout in mind. Remember: Å·²©ÓéÀÖ longer it takes CDBG-DR grants to close, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ longer Congress must wait for outcomes of long-term disaster recovery investment.

When grantees prove Å·²©ÓéÀÖir ability to offer, execute, and close meaningful recovery programs, Congress is more likely to continue to allocate Å·²©ÓéÀÖse transformative funds. To help preserve CDBG-DR funding, be sure to set up your program for a timely closeout.

Resources

Subscribe to get our latest insightssubscribe