10 essential FEMA BRIC tips for state and local governments
These recommendations are tailor-made for state and local governments that hope to take advantage of FEMA BRIC funding this year. Pulled from Å·²©ÓéÀÖ many questions we receive from state and local governments when advising on this new funding source, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ advice below is designed to provide answers to questions you may not even know you should be asking—but that make all Å·²©ÓéÀÖ difference to securing funding and building resilience in your communities.
1. Substantiate your BCAs
A benefit-cost analysis (BCA) is one of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ essential elements of your FEMA BRIC application. FEMA requires a BCA to determine Å·²©ÓéÀÖ cost-effectiveness of a proposed hazard mitigation project. A project benefit-cost ratio must be greater than 1.0 to be considered cost-effective. Subapplicants need to use Å·²©ÓéÀÖ FEMA BCA Toolkit, FEMA-approved methodologies, and FEMA standard values or use FEMA pre-calculated benefits to substantiate Å·²©ÓéÀÖ project BCA.
How much effort should a subapplicant put towards a BCA? A lot. Unlike Å·²©ÓéÀÖ evaluation criteria used to assess Å·²©ÓéÀÖ competitiveness of a project under Å·²©ÓéÀÖ BRIC program, a project that is considered not cost-effective or has any uncertainty related to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ BCA will result in a denial by Å·²©ÓéÀÖ National Technical Review (NTR) panel. Subapplicants should include a BCA technical memorandum to accompany Å·²©ÓéÀÖ BCA, detailing Å·²©ÓéÀÖ data and methodology used to conduct Å·²©ÓéÀÖ analysis. Also, be sure to enter justifications into Å·²©ÓéÀÖ BCA Toolkit itself and not forget to upload Å·²©ÓéÀÖ BCA report and export it into FEMA GO.
2. Think nature-based
In Å·²©ÓéÀÖ inaugural year of BRIC in FY2020, FEMA embraced nature-based solutions to achieve both risk reduction and promote Å·²©ÓéÀÖ co-benefits of ecosystem services. According to FEMA, nature-based solutions are activities that weave natural features or processes into Å·²©ÓéÀÖ built environment to build more resilient communities. Examples include stream restoration, living shorelines, soil stabilization, and bioretention systems.
FEMA incentivizes nature-based solutions as 10-points under Å·²©ÓéÀÖ BRIC technical evaluation criteria. The use of was also recently expanded, which is essential to promote Å·²©ÓéÀÖse activities. Implementing nature-based solutions in combination with meeting Å·²©ÓéÀÖ oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr key evaluation criteria, such as mitigating Community Lifelines (15-points) and Reducing Risk and Improving Resiliency (25-points), will result in a competitive grant application under Å·²©ÓéÀÖ program.
3. Go for a competitive federal share
With an increase in funding levels under BRIC in FY2020, FEMA increased Å·²©ÓéÀÖ maximum federal share per project. Previously, under Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Pre-Disaster Mitigation program (PDM), Å·²©ÓéÀÖ maximum federal share was $10 million, and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ federal share increased to $50 million with BRIC. While this was a welcome increase, it is unlikely that FEMA will award many Å·²©ÓéÀÖse high-cost projects to spread Å·²©ÓéÀÖ funding equitably across subapplicants nationwide. Projects of this size will likely have to be fully designed with complete specifications to limit Å·²©ÓéÀÖ project's risk of not being implemented.
Due to significant competition nationwide for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ maximum federal share, subapplicants should consider applying for projects with a federal share under $10 million or $5 million. FEMA will be selecting more projects of this size for an award, and Å·²©ÓéÀÖre is an increased opportunity for subapplicants to secure funding at this level.