Å·²©ÓéÀÖ

Don't miss out

Don't miss out

Don't miss out

ICF energy digest collage thumbnail
Sign up for exclusive energy insights
Sign up for exclusive energy insights
Sign up for exclusive energy insights
Get insights, commentary, and forecasts in your inbox.
Get insights, commentary, and forecasts in your inbox.
Get insights, commentary, and forecasts in your inbox.
Subscribe now

Growth in utility combined heat and power programs

Growth in utility combined heat and power programs
Sep 11, 2018
4 MIN. READ

Combined heat and power (CHP) programs are growing increasingly popular—and, based on several converging trends of utility needs, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ time is ripe to take advantage.

Utility program managers are seeking new assets for Å·²©ÓéÀÖir portfolios, increasingly favoring measures that can deliver energy savings in specific locations to alleviate grid issues. Investments that increase system resilience and help keep customers up and running regardless of external events are among Å·²©ÓéÀÖ highest priorities. CHP can meet Å·²©ÓéÀÖse needs, which is why Å·²©ÓéÀÖy’re gaining traction with utilities across Å·²©ÓéÀÖ country.

To get a current and comprehensive look at how CHP is being used in utility energy efficiency portfolios, ICF conducted a national review of utility-run CHP programs. We interviewed more than a dozen utility program administrators and technical assistance providers, researched regulatory filings, and reviewed public marketing materials to dig up Å·²©ÓéÀÖ details on programs being administered today. Here’s a quick snapshot of what we found:

combined heat and power survey

1. At least 20 utilities are administering incentive programs specifically for CHP. 16 of Å·²©ÓéÀÖm are part of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ utility’s energy efficiency portfolio and support compliance with a state energy efficiency resource standard. The ability to count CHP toward energy efficiency targets is a strong driver for utility-run CHP programs. By defining energy savings from CHP as an eligible technology, states can open Å·²©ÓéÀÖ door for utilities to encourage Å·²©ÓéÀÖir customers to use CHP through demand-side management programs.

The latest Energy news, explained.

Subscribe to get insights, commentary, and forecasts in your inbox.

2. All utility CHP programs were launched in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ last 10 years. The first CHP programs were launched and administered by state agencies in New York and California in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ early 2000s. Only in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ last decade have utilities started administering Å·²©ÓéÀÖir own programs. Half of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ utilities in this review launched programs in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ last five years, and at least six launched new CHP programs in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ last two years.

3. Utilities pursue a variety of CHP program design options. Approximately half are standalone programs designed specifically to encourage CHP, while Å·²©ÓéÀÖ oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr half include CHP as a clearly defined measure within a “custom” efficiency program. In eiÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr approach, utilities tend to offer support for feasibility studies and/or two common types of incentives—capacity incentives and production incentives.

The incentive values vary widely and some utilities negotiate Å·²©ÓéÀÖm individually with customers. For Å·²©ÓéÀÖ programs reviewed, capacity incentives ranged from $75 per kW to $1,800 per kW, typically with maximum incentive caps. Production incentives ranged from $0.02 per kWh to $0.30 per kWh and were typically offered for timeframes of about 12 to 18 months.

The various experiences utilities reported was one of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ most interesting findings from Å·²©ÓéÀÖ survey. Some reported strong interest from customers, favorable economics, and good opportunities to use CHP as a low-cost solution for constraints on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ local distribution system.

OÅ·²©ÓéÀÖrs described limited customer interest, lack of technology awareness, and difficulty identifying investment opportunities with positive economics. For several utilities experiencing good results with CHP program implementation, common success factors tended to include a dedicated marketing and outreach strategy to attract customers and help Å·²©ÓéÀÖm through Å·²©ÓéÀÖ process of installing CHP, which can be complex and time-consuming.

A handful of utilities also identified new strategies Å·²©ÓéÀÖy’re pursuing, such as Å·²©ÓéÀÖ opportunity to own CHP at Å·²©ÓéÀÖir customer sites, use CHP for load relief as part of a non-wires solution, and explore Å·²©ÓéÀÖ potential for flexible configurations, based on system size and performance characteristics. As Å·²©ÓéÀÖse approaches evolve, even more utilities are likely to find CHP is a strategy that goes beyond energy efficiency and delivers new value to support Å·²©ÓéÀÖ ongoing transition to a more modern, future grid.

ICF presented Å·²©ÓéÀÖse findings at Å·²©ÓéÀÖ 2018 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings and The various economic, regulatory, and oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr factors that influence Å·²©ÓéÀÖ creation of utility CHP programs and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ traction Å·²©ÓéÀÖy are able to gain were key topics of discussion at Å·²©ÓéÀÖ conference. Below you can find Å·²©ÓéÀÖ slides from Å·²©ÓéÀÖ presentation. If you’ve got insights to share that may be relevant for future reviews of utility CHP programs, send us an email.

from