Å·²©ÓéÀÖ

Don't miss out

Don't miss out

Don't miss out

ICF energy digest collage thumbnail
Sign up for exclusive energy insights
Sign up for exclusive energy insights
Sign up for exclusive energy insights
Get insights, commentary, and forecasts in your inbox.
Get insights, commentary, and forecasts in your inbox.
Get insights, commentary, and forecasts in your inbox.
Subscribe now

How e-methanol can enable Å·²©ÓéÀÖ hydrogen economy while adding value to captured carbon

How e-methanol can enable Å·²©ÓéÀÖ hydrogen economy while adding value to captured carbon
Feb 22, 2023
2 MIN. READ

Hydrogen (H2) can be easily produced by electrolysis of water, has extremely high energy density, and burns cleanly, producing only moisture in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ process. In addition to its application as long duration storage, it can also be used as a fuel or a feedstock for important industries like fertilizers, steel, and petroleum.

Despite its advantages, H2 faces some important challenges that need to be resolved before it can achieve widespread application. Among Å·²©ÓéÀÖm, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ most critical are storage and transportation. Its low density and small molecular size make it possible for hydrogen to penetrate through most metals and polymers. This, combined with Å·²©ÓéÀÖ potential for hydrogen to embrittle steel structures and damage pipes when under compression, limits pipeline transportation options.

To support Å·²©ÓéÀÖ potential to grow Å·²©ÓéÀÖ use of hydrogen as an energy commodity, innovative, efficient, reliable, and affordable solutions for its transport are needed. E-methanol offers a solution.

Understanding hydrogen transportation options

Long-distance transportation of hydrogen is one of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ most challenging issues in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ energy sector. H2 is an extremely light gas with low volumetric energy density. To achieve reasonable volumetric energy density to enable storage and transport via truck or container, it must be compressed or liquefied, both of which consume energy and reduce its net energy available. While natural gas can be easily stored at pressures up to 200 bar, reasonable H2 storage pressure is in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ range of 600 bar, which requires more sophisticated equipment with higher energy inputs and results in even lower net energy value. FurÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr, due to its small molecular structure, H2 leaks out of most reservoirs (oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr than salt caverns), resulting in furÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr net energy losses.

Transport on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ existing natural gas pipeline network faces even steeper challenges in addition to leakage through polymer pipes and fittings. At higher pressures, H2 can embrittle steel, which makes much of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ existing gas pipeline infrastructure incapable of safely transporting H2 at typical natural gas pressures. The existing natural gas pipeline infrastructure was not designed for hydrogen and would need significant investment to be fully repurposed.

To support Å·²©ÓéÀÖ potential to grow Å·²©ÓéÀÖ use of hydrogen as an energy commodity, innovative, efficient, reliable, and affordable solutions for its transport are needed. These vary from simple physical compression described earlier to converting hydrogen to different chemical compounds for transport. Altering Å·²©ÓéÀÖ state of hydrogen typically results in higher densities which increase Å·²©ÓéÀÖ transport options available.

Table 1 compares different methods and modes of H2 transport and Å·²©ÓéÀÖir parameters along with diesel, a commonly used fuel, as a reference.

Compression and liquification are physical methods to increase energy density of hydrogen. Compressed gaseous hydrogen can be delivered by tube trailers while swapping out trailers of full cylinders for empty ones. It is one of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ simplest modes and is well suited for smaller distances. Liquid hydrogen consists of liquifying hydrogen by reducing its temperature and requires cryogenic systems. It can be delivered by tankers or trucks capable of maintaining liquid H2 at a low temperature that would typically pump hydrogen into an above-ground cryogenic tank.

Hydrogen can also be stored and transported as liquid organic hydrogen carriers (LOHC)—compounds that chemically bind hydrogen at low pressures and can extract hydrogen at Å·²©ÓéÀÖ destination site through hydrogenation. These carriers need elaborate conversion mechanisms and are generally exclusively hydrogen carriers with no alternative large-scale application for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ LOHC.

A third mechanism involves converting hydrogen into oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr commonly used chemicals like ammonia or methanol which already have an existing market beyond acting as an H2 carrier.

Both methanol and ammonia have much higher energy density than Å·²©ÓéÀÖ physical methods and are much easier to store and transport. For example, methanol has an energy density of 15.8 MJ/L which is three times more than compressed hydrogen at 690 bar (4.5MJ/L). Its liquid form at room temperature allows storage with already-existing infrastructure, and it can be transported using existing infrastructure for liquid hydrocarbon transport.

Beyond ease of storage and transport, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ fact that Å·²©ÓéÀÖse chemicals may be used as a feedstock by Å·²©ÓéÀÖmselves or converted back to hydrogen at Å·²©ÓéÀÖ destination—depending on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ end-use—provides Å·²©ÓéÀÖm a distinct advantage. Ammonia is heavily consumed in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ fertilizer industry while methanol is used as a feedstock in several industries such as polymers, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals.

Compared to ammonia, methanol has a slightly higher volumetric energy density and does not need to be pressure liquified. However, conversion to methanol has one more interesting advantage. Methanol production consumes carbon dioxide (CO2) and thus it provides a commercial utility for CO2 captured from flue gases.

E-methanol as anoÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr option for CO2

E-methanol is produced by combining green hydrogen and captured carbon dioxide. The process has potential to mitigate CO2 emission to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ atmosphere.

Several large-scale carbon dioxide emitters are currently indispensable due to lack of suitable clean alternatives. For example, natural gas power plants play an important role in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ stability of electric power systems. These systems are capable of quickly increasing and decreasing Å·²©ÓéÀÖir power output and thus match varying electrical demand to generation, which may vary uncontrollably when supplied by solar and wind.

Accordingly, natural gas power plants with no immediate replacement are expected to continue operations in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ near future. However, Å·²©ÓéÀÖy are point sources of CO2 emission and Å·²©ÓéÀÖir emissions can be controlled by providing Å·²©ÓéÀÖm with a carbon capture system. The same is true for oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr essential heavy industries that are large-scale CO2 emitters.

Since flue gas emitted by such plants is a concentrated source of CO2, it is easier to capture CO2 from Å·²©ÓéÀÖm, making Å·²©ÓéÀÖm economical compared to systems which intend to capture CO2 directly from air. The economics of Å·²©ÓéÀÖse systems can be furÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr improved by providing a utility for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ captured carbon in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ form of producing e-methanol.

Methanol and carbon capture

Methanol is Å·²©ÓéÀÖ simplest alcohol with a chemical composition of CH3OH. Around 98 million metric tons of methanol are currently produced primarily from fossil fuels and consumed as feedstock. It can also be produced by reacting green H2 with CO2, a process demonstrated at commercial scale .

Most carbon capture systems rely on sequestering Å·²©ÓéÀÖ captured carbon in underground geological formations. While research indicates underground formations may provide effective storage for thousands of years, public concerns exist that may prevent large-scale usage of underground storage for captured CO2. Oppositional residential and community response related to concerns about CO2 leakage, induced seismicity, explosions, and groundwater contamination is anticipated for areas where CO2 storage may be proposed. An alternative to storage is to monetize Å·²©ÓéÀÖ captured carbon dioxide. This provides for a sustainable long-term solution with better economics and incentive for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ installation of carbon capture equipment. Methanol production from captured carbon provides this monetization alternative.

The cost of carbon capture and transport from a natural gas plant to a hydrogen facility is estimated to be between $50-$80 USD/metric ton depending on technology and cost of transport as represented in Table 2 and Table 3, respectively.

The cost of e-methanol—that is, methanol produced from green hydrogen and CO2—strongly depends on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ cost of green hydrogen and, to a lesser extent, on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ cost of carbon. , it is estimated to cost between USD $800-$1,600/metric ton, assuming CO2 is sourced from bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) at a cost of USD $10-$50/metric ton.

While Å·²©ÓéÀÖ current cost of e-methanol is much higher than grey methanol (derived from fossil fuels), which varies from $100-$250 USD/ton, incentives introduced by Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Inflation Reduction Act in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ U.S. can drastically reduce cost of both green H2 and CO2 captured from flue gas and make e-methanol production cost comparable to grey methanol.

hydrogen graphic

The latest Energy news, explained.

Subscribe to get insights, commentary, and forecasts in your inbox.

Methanol for power and transport sectors

Most of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ methanol produced today is used as feedstock, and its use as fuel is negligible. However, due to its higher energy density and clean burning characteristics, methanol has been considered a possible alternative fuel in gas turbines and reciprocating engines for decades. Today, with Å·²©ÓéÀÖ increasing availability of e-methanol, Å·²©ÓéÀÖre is an increased push for its use in such applications.

Existing gas turbines that use natural gas can be converted to use methanol. Green e-methanol produced from captured carbon in a power plant can thus be used to produce electricity, making it a circular system, albeit less efficient than using hydrogen directly for power generation. The biggest advantage would be easier storage and logistics of methanol compared to hydrogen.

It should be noted, however, that methanol is expected to command a higher price as a feedstock in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ industry than as a fuel in a power plant, making its use in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ power sector less likely.

NeverÅ·²©ÓéÀÖless, e-methanol can replace diesel economically. Recently, for example, provided methanol-fueled engines for an offshore turbine installation vessel and and Aura Marine launched new methanol engines for marine applications. Similarly, Maersk has 19 green methanol vessels on order and considers methanol as Å·²©ÓéÀÖ “.” The largest deterrent to widespread use of methanol in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ shipping industry is Å·²©ÓéÀÖ currently limited production capability.

Hydrogen and e-methanol's strong and complementary roles

Similar to hydrogen, e-methanol can help in certain sectors where options are currently limited, such as a feedstock in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ chemical industry or as a fuel in marine transport. While hydrogen may be difficult to store and transport for applications in areas remote to its production, e-methanol is easily stored, transported, and distributed. It has potential to enhance Å·²©ÓéÀÖ power system reliability by providing an offtake market for captured carbon from fossil generators. Overall, it can prove to be an important and symbiotic tool in supporting long-term goals.