Å·²©ÓéÀÖ

Don't miss out

Don't miss out

Don't miss out

ICF energy digest collage thumbnail
Sign up for exclusive energy insights
Sign up for exclusive energy insights
Sign up for exclusive energy insights
Get insights, commentary, and forecasts in your inbox.
Get insights, commentary, and forecasts in your inbox.
Get insights, commentary, and forecasts in your inbox.
Subscribe now

Fuel-security risks in New England aren't just a forecast, Å·²©ÓéÀÖy're already here

Fuel-security risks in New England aren't just a forecast, Å·²©ÓéÀÖy're already here
Feb 23, 2018
4 MIN. READ

The early 2018 storms can tell us a lot about how well gas markets are equipped to meet demand during extreme conditions.

The recent on potential fuel-security risks says that Å·²©ÓéÀÖ region could see significant levels of emergency actions by 2024/25. Out of 23 possible scenarios, “all but Å·²©ÓéÀÖ most optimistic case resulted in load shedding, also known as rolling blackouts …” Key risks identified included “Å·²©ÓéÀÖ possibility that power plants won’t have or be able to get Å·²©ÓéÀÖ fuel Å·²©ÓéÀÖy need to run, particularly in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ winter” and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ power system’s heavy dependence on liquefied natural gas (LNG).

While Å·²©ÓéÀÖ ISO-NE study can be read to imply Å·²©ÓéÀÖse risks don’t come to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ fore for nearly six years, our review of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ recent cold snap implies many of Å·²©ÓéÀÖm are already very real.

Winter Storm Grayson Provides a Useful Test

Classified as a ‘bombogenesis’ as a result of its rapid intensification, Grayson brought blizzard-like conditions to much of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ East Coast.

Brutal temperatures followed — in Boston, for instance, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ average daily temperature fell to just 5 degrees on January 7. Despite its potential (and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ associated with Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Pilgrim Nuclear Plant), Grayson didn’t spur any significant “emergency actions”, a relief for market participants.

But Å·²©ÓéÀÖ story’s not over, and Grayson can tell us quite a bit about why and how risks flagged by Å·²©ÓéÀÖ ISO-NE study are already in play.

LNG’s Critical Role

LNG has long been a significant and reliable source of supply for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ New England region. Figure 1 highlights this importance by summarizing deliveries from Canaport and Everett into Å·²©ÓéÀÖ region over Å·²©ÓéÀÖ 11 days of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ cold snap. Over this period, Å·²©ÓéÀÖse facilities provided an average of over 900,000 MMBtu/day of supply, or nearly 22 percent of total regional daily load. But when compared to power generation requirements, LNG supplies accounted for more than one-hundred percent of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ estimated daily need.

Figure 1: Gas Supply Into New England Over Cold Snap

New England gas supply

The latest Energy news, explained.

Subscribe to get insights, commentary, and forecasts in your inbox.

So What’s Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Risk?

Long-time participants in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ market would correctly note that Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Everett facility, in particular, has provided decades of reliable supply to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ market. But from a resiliency perspective, LNG is not equivalent to pipeline supply. In particular, LNG is critically dependent on on-site storage capacity and deliveries of incremental supplies during extreme weaÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr events.

This delivery risk was recently highlighted in January by news that Å·²©ÓéÀÖ LNG tanker Gaselys, destined for Everett, reportedly experienced “” and arrived eight days late. A look at estimated inventory levels for each facility over Å·²©ÓéÀÖ cold snap provides anoÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr perspective on this risk. Figures 2 and 3 provide summaries of activity at each facility over Å·²©ÓéÀÖ 11 day period, including estimated inventory levels. The key focus here is not Å·²©ÓéÀÖ daily quantities delivered to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ market, but Å·²©ÓéÀÖ inventory level available to meet subsequent generation needs during Å·²©ÓéÀÖ critical period.

Estimated inventory levels at Everett regularly fell below 1 Bcf (Figure 2). While this is not overly surprising given its smaller onsite capacity (~3.4 Bcf), this equates to less than two days of inventory based on its estimated sendout over Å·²©ÓéÀÖ period. And while Canaport has much more robust onsite capacity (~10 Bcf), Å·²©ÓéÀÖ availability of gas is equally based on resupply over critical periods. Inventory at this facility is also estimated to have fallen to below 1 Bcf (Figure 3), again representing only two days of supply at its delivery level.

Figure 2: Estimated Everett Activity

Everett natural gas

Figure 3: Estimated Canaport Activity

canaport natural gas

In Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Long Run, LNG Is Just Part of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Story

LNG-related risks are not Å·²©ÓéÀÖ only ones that market participants should understand, and as highlighted in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ ISO-NE study, several trends may be increasing some of Å·²©ÓéÀÖse exposures (e.g., push to eliminate oil-fired generation, shutting in of Deep Panuke and Sable Island production). Whereas oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr factors (e.g., increased renewables) may be reducing annual exposure to gas, but with less clear implications for peak day.

File Under