
Fuel-security risks in New England aren't just a forecast, Å·²©ÓéÀÖy're already here
The early 2018 storms can tell us a lot about how well gas markets are equipped to meet demand during extreme conditions.
The recent on potential fuel-security risks says that Å·²©ÓéÀÖ region could see significant levels of emergency actions by 2024/25. Out of 23 possible scenarios, “all but Å·²©ÓéÀÖ most optimistic case resulted in load shedding, also known as rolling blackouts …” Key risks identified included “Å·²©ÓéÀÖ possibility that power plants won’t have or be able to get Å·²©ÓéÀÖ fuel Å·²©ÓéÀÖy need to run, particularly in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ winter” and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ power system’s heavy dependence on liquefied natural gas (LNG).
While Å·²©ÓéÀÖ ISO-NE study can be read to imply Å·²©ÓéÀÖse risks don’t come to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ fore for nearly six years, our review of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ recent cold snap implies many of Å·²©ÓéÀÖm are already very real.
Winter Storm Grayson Provides a Useful Test
Classified as a ‘bombogenesis’ as a result of its rapid intensification, Grayson brought blizzard-like conditions to much of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ East Coast.
Brutal temperatures followed — in Boston, for instance, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ average daily temperature fell to just 5 degrees on January 7. Despite its potential (and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ associated with Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Pilgrim Nuclear Plant), Grayson didn’t spur any significant “emergency actions”, a relief for market participants.
But Å·²©ÓéÀÖ story’s not over, and Grayson can tell us quite a bit about why and how risks flagged by Å·²©ÓéÀÖ ISO-NE study are already in play.
LNG’s Critical Role
LNG has long been a significant and reliable source of supply for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ New England region. Figure 1 highlights this importance by summarizing deliveries from Canaport and Everett into Å·²©ÓéÀÖ region over Å·²©ÓéÀÖ 11 days of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ cold snap. Over this period, Å·²©ÓéÀÖse facilities provided an average of over 900,000 MMBtu/day of supply, or nearly 22 percent of total regional daily load. But when compared to power generation requirements, LNG supplies accounted for more than one-hundred percent of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ estimated daily need.
Figure 1: Gas Supply Into New England Over Cold Snap

So What’s Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Risk?
Long-time participants in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ market would correctly note that Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Everett facility, in particular, has provided decades of reliable supply to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ market. But from a resiliency perspective, LNG is not equivalent to pipeline supply. In particular, LNG is critically dependent on on-site storage capacity and deliveries of incremental supplies during extreme weaÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr events.
This delivery risk was recently highlighted in January by news that Å·²©ÓéÀÖ LNG tanker Gaselys, destined for Everett, reportedly experienced “” and arrived eight days late. A look at estimated inventory levels for each facility over Å·²©ÓéÀÖ cold snap provides anoÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr perspective on this risk. Figures 2 and 3 provide summaries of activity at each facility over Å·²©ÓéÀÖ 11 day period, including estimated inventory levels. The key focus here is not Å·²©ÓéÀÖ daily quantities delivered to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ market, but Å·²©ÓéÀÖ inventory level available to meet subsequent generation needs during Å·²©ÓéÀÖ critical period.
Estimated inventory levels at Everett regularly fell below 1 Bcf (Figure 2). While this is not overly surprising given its smaller onsite capacity (~3.4 Bcf), this equates to less than two days of inventory based on its estimated sendout over Å·²©ÓéÀÖ period. And while Canaport has much more robust onsite capacity (~10 Bcf), Å·²©ÓéÀÖ availability of gas is equally based on resupply over critical periods. Inventory at this facility is also estimated to have fallen to below 1 Bcf (Figure 3), again representing only two days of supply at its delivery level.
Figure 2: Estimated Everett Activity

Figure 3: Estimated Canaport Activity

In Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Long Run, LNG Is Just Part of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Story
LNG-related risks are not Å·²©ÓéÀÖ only ones that market participants should understand, and as highlighted in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ ISO-NE study, several trends may be increasing some of Å·²©ÓéÀÖse exposures (e.g., push to eliminate oil-fired generation, shutting in of Deep Panuke and Sable Island production). Whereas oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr factors (e.g., increased renewables) may be reducing annual exposure to gas, but with less clear implications for peak day.