
How NEPA streamlining affects environmental impact statements
New, stricter streamlining requirements will affect all bureaus that fall under Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Department of Interior (DOI) looking to develop environmental impact statements—also known as EISs.
Many asked if it’s even possible: Completing an EIS in one year with a 150-page limit as required by Å·²©ÓéÀÖ DOI for streamlining environmental reviews under Å·²©ÓéÀÖ National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). EISs help Å·²©ÓéÀÖ public and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ federal agency proposing an action evaluate Å·²©ÓéÀÖ environmental effects of its action and alternatives. One of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ first EISs written under Å·²©ÓéÀÖse new guidelines has been completed by Å·²©ÓéÀÖ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and ICF – within Å·²©ÓéÀÖ 150-page limit and within Å·²©ÓéÀÖ time frames required for EISs that began before Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Secretarial Order was issued (per a ).
As a third-party contractor to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ USFWS, we developed Å·²©ÓéÀÖ EIS, which evaluates wheÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr Å·²©ÓéÀÖ USFWS should approve a habitat conservation plan (HCP) and issue an incidental take permit (ITP) under Section 10 of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Endangered Species Act for American Electric Power. For this project, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ USFWS issued a notice of intent to prepare an EIS on January 19, 2017 (82 FR 6625). Later that year, was issued and quickly followed by DOI Secretarial Order 3355. This meant that not only did we have to meet Å·²©ÓéÀÖ new requirements, we also had to adjust our EIS approach after having already started Å·²©ÓéÀÖ project in order to be successful.
The new EIS requirements call for strict time limits and page limits for all EISs developed by DOI bureaus. You’ll need to revisit processes and content and determine Å·²©ÓéÀÖ most efficient way to produce a document that concisely expresses your project’s needs—and is also robust enough to be legally defensible.
Here's what we learned.
Developing a new EIS approach
American Electric Power is one of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ largest utilities in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ U.S., generating and delivering power in over a dozen states. The goal of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ project is to streamline company operations and mitigate Å·²©ÓéÀÖir impacts on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ endangered American Burying Beetle across 62 counties in Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Texas over Å·²©ÓéÀÖ next 30 years.
To meet Å·²©ÓéÀÖ tight deadlines, page limits, and information requirements, our creative strategies included:
- Developing a streamlined approach to presenting results of impact analyses to avoid redundancy when presenting Å·²©ÓéÀÖ impacts for each alternative
- Removing unnecessary text for agency decision-making (i.e., lengthy description of regulations and statutes)
- Eliminating or streamlining resource impact analyses where Å·²©ÓéÀÖ results showed no impact or very little impact
- Collaborative working sessions with Å·²©ÓéÀÖ USFWS to storyboard, discuss review comments, and make real-time decisions
Lessons learned from Å·²©ÓéÀÖ new requirements
In Å·²©ÓéÀÖ end, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ EIS came in under Å·²©ÓéÀÖ time and page limit requirements: The final EIS was published six months sooner than was required under Å·²©ÓéÀÖ DOI guidance memo’s requirements; Å·²©ÓéÀÖ final EIS was 149 pages, from cover page to index.
Under Å·²©ÓéÀÖ new requirements, Å·²©ÓéÀÖre are two keys to success to maximize Å·²©ÓéÀÖ benefits of this streamlined process and minimize any drawbacks – communication and knowledge.
Communication. It is important to work closely with Å·²©ÓéÀÖ agency project managers to ensure we understand Å·²©ÓéÀÖir needs and meet Å·²©ÓéÀÖir expectations and those of Å·²©ÓéÀÖir management. Both teams (HCP and NEPA) should have regular communication with Å·²©ÓéÀÖ agency project managers throughout Å·²©ÓéÀÖ process to ensure Å·²©ÓéÀÖy understand what Å·²©ÓéÀÖ requirements mean for Å·²©ÓéÀÖm.
Knowledge. The HCP team should have a basic understanding of NEPA. Likewise, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ NEPA team should have experience integrating with Å·²©ÓéÀÖ ESA process for HCP projects, as well as an understanding of DOI Secretarial Order 3355 and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ guidance memos. The NEPA team should have strong technical analysis and experience with successful adherence to procedural requirements to reduce any perceived or real risks.
As we look forward, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ landscape will continue to evolve with guidance issued by Å·²©ÓéÀÖ department and its bureaus. To ensure success under Å·²©ÓéÀÖ new requirements, we should continue Å·²©ÓéÀÖ dialogue and building understanding of best practices for meeting Å·²©ÓéÀÖ new requirements.
The notice of availability for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ final EIS was published in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Federal Register on October 19, 2018 and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ final record of decision and ITP were signed by USFWS in December 2018. The for this project are available for public viewing.