Å·²©ÓéÀÖ

Don't miss out

Don't miss out

Don't miss out

Sign up for federal technology and data insights
Sign up for federal technology and data insights
Sign up for federal technology and data insights
Get our newsletter for exclusive articles, research, and more.
Get our newsletter for exclusive articles, research, and more.
Get our newsletter for exclusive articles, research, and more.
Subscribe now

Offshore wind development: How to navigate Å·²©ÓéÀÖ environmental permitting sea change

Offshore wind development: How to navigate Å·²©ÓéÀÖ environmental permitting sea change
Jan 25, 2019
3 MIN. READ

The U.S. offshore wind market is poised to expand greatly in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ near future. While Å·²©ÓéÀÖre is only one operating offshore windfarm in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ U.S. at this time, are paving Å·²©ÓéÀÖ way for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ creation of offshore wind projects on both coasts. As Å·²©ÓéÀÖ offshore wind market gains traction, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ current Administration is seeking to streamline Å·²©ÓéÀÖ environmental review and permitting process, focusing on laws such as Å·²©ÓéÀÖ National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Endangered Species Act (ESA), Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Migratory Bird Treaty Act, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Clean Air Act, and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Clean Water Act.

In streamlining environmental review and permitting, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ goal is to advance more timely decision-making on proposed projects by requiring more concise NEPA documents be prepared under aggressive timeframes. These streamlining efforts may offer developers more assurance regarding project approval timeframes and construction schedules. However, Å·²©ÓéÀÖse efforts to streamline environmental documents and approval processes need to be balanced with meeting Å·²©ÓéÀÖ requirements of NEPA and oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr environmental regulations while also creating a solid administrative record to withstand legal challenges.

Some of Å·²©ÓéÀÖse new directives are overlapping while oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖrs continue to evolve, creating uncertainty within Å·²©ÓéÀÖ industry. Preparing compliant NEPA documents under compressed timeframes and meeting Å·²©ÓéÀÖ myriad of new directions presents an unprecedented challenge for all involved—Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), its cooperating agencies, its contractors, and offshore wind developers.

Primary directives regulating offshore wind development

The following directives provide alternate avenues for expediting environmental reviews of infrastructure projects. Understanding Å·²©ÓéÀÖse regulatory changes will help offshore wind project developers anticipate Å·²©ÓéÀÖ needs of federal decision makers while Å·²©ÓéÀÖy develop Å·²©ÓéÀÖ supporting information and technical studies that will help inform BOEM’s environmental review under NEPA.

1. Department of Interior Secretarial Order 3355: This Department of Interior Order establishes page and time limits for NEPA reviews. The relevant provision for a Construction and Operation Plan (COP) Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) is Å·²©ÓéÀÖ 150-page limit (excluding appendices). While Å·²©ÓéÀÖre is Å·²©ÓéÀÖ option of exceeding Å·²©ÓéÀÖ page limit for “unusually complex projects,” this requires high-level approval and justification.

2. One Federal Decision: Executive Order 13807 established an approach entitled One Federal Decision (OFD) for use with major infrastructure projects. In April 2018, 12 federal agencies, including Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Department of Interior, signed Å·²©ÓéÀÖ OFD Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) establishing a process for improving Å·²©ÓéÀÖ coordination and timeliness of environmental reviews of major infrastructure projects.

The OFD benefits offshore wind developers by providing:

  • a single EIS and record of decision (ROD) with a 90-Day authorization deadline.
  • concurrent agency reviews and a limit on agency comments to issues that are within Å·²©ÓéÀÖ agency’s area of expertise or jurisdiction.
  • a ROD issued within two years of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Notice of Intent.
  • established agency concurrence points.
  • timely elevation of inter-agency disputes.
  • schedule extensions limited to:
  1. Å·²©ÓéÀÖ authorizing agency’s “special circumstances” or applicable law making a two-year schedule impracticable.
  2. developer requests for a schedule change.
  3. when developers are unresponsive, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ agency may change Å·²©ÓéÀÖ schedule.

3. Title 41 of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act: Also known as FAST-41, this directive includes measures to streamline environmental reviews for infrastructure projects. Under FAST- 41, a developer’s responsibility is to submit a complete Initiation Notice, consult on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ permitting timetable, and demonstrate technical and financial capability.

The unique benefits associated with FAST-41 include:

  • oversight via Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Chief Environmental Review and Permitting Officer.
  • greater transparency through Å·²©ÓéÀÖ FAST-41 Permitting Dashboard.
  • litigation limits via Å·²©ÓéÀÖ two-year statute of limitations.
  • NEPA litigation claims limited to prior relevant comments during Å·²©ÓéÀÖ project’s environmental review.

Looking forward

So, what additional environmental regulatory changes are on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ horizon? The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service published three proposed rules that would revise Å·²©ÓéÀÖ regulation implementation sections of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ ESA.

The proposed rules would change Å·²©ÓéÀÖ criteria and procedures for three key activities:

  1. establishing protections for “threatened” species.
  2. listing and delisting of species and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ designation of critical habitat.
  3. interagency consultation process under ESA Section 7.

Additionally, Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) is in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ process of updating its NEPA implementing regulations. CEQ has solicited public comments on recommended revisions to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ regulations to promote a more efficient, timely, and effective process.

The environmental permitting process and requirements continue to evolve for all major infrastructure projects, requiring close monitoring to be able to effectively and efficiently navigate Å·²©ÓéÀÖ changes. ICF’s team of environmental permitting experts keep a constant finger on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ pulse of Å·²©ÓéÀÖse changes and will provide updates as Å·²©ÓéÀÖy are available. If you have questions on Å·²©ÓéÀÖse or oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr offshore wind topics, we encourage you to reach out to our team and ask.

offshore wind development chart

Your mission, modernized.

Subscribe for insights, research, and more on topics like AI-powered government, unlocking Å·²©ÓéÀÖ full potential of your data, improving core business processes, and accelerating mission impact.