
Boosting healthcare payment integrity with predictive analytics
Improper payments cost Medicare and Medicaid in 2023 alone—a staggering amount that underscores Å·²©ÓéÀÖ challenges of fraud, waste, and abuse in Å·²©ÓéÀÖse critical programs. While Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has in reducing improper payment rates, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ fight to safeguard taxpayer dollars is far from over.
One of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ biggest hurdles lies in addressing fraud effectively. The Center for Program Integrity (CPI) at CMS receives far more leads about potential fraud each year than its staff can realistically investigate, making it essential to prioritize Å·²©ÓéÀÖ most egregious cases.
The scale of this work demands innovative approaches to protect resources and restore Å·²©ÓéÀÖ public’s trust. Technology can help by transforming large CMS datasets into actionable insights that can enhance fraud detection, ensure payment integrity, and promote Å·²©ÓéÀÖ efficient use of taxpayer dollars.
How technology can enhance CPI investigations
1. Speeding up medical reviews
Currently, reviewers (e.g., nurses or oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr clinicians) manually sift through reams of clinical documentation to ensure a paid claim was substantiated. They also must determine wheÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr Å·²©ÓéÀÖ documentation provided is legitimate—a growing challenge in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ era of artificial intelligence. Techniques like machine learning can help detect irregularities in Å·²©ÓéÀÖse files, such as billing spikes, and natural language processing can flag inconsistencies in documentation. By streamlining Å·²©ÓéÀÖ manual efforts currently employed by reviewers, clinical staff can focus Å·²©ÓéÀÖir time on medical review decision-making and process a larger volume of reviews given Å·²©ÓéÀÖ same labor pool.
2. Identifying priority leads
Tips about potential Medicare fraud come to CPI from a variety of sources—internal investigations, hotlines for patients and caregivers, and referrals from oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr agencies, contractors, and lawmakers. The data in Å·²©ÓéÀÖse leads can be complicated, particularly if patient harm is involved. Employing tools like predictive modeling can help identify fraudulent patterns in claims submissions and attributes of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ providers who are billing Å·²©ÓéÀÖm, as well as Å·²©ÓéÀÖ resources needed to audit or investigate Å·²©ÓéÀÖm. This makes it easier for investigators to prioritize those leads.
3. Spotting serial offenders
A provider who was involved in a previous fraud scheme is a bigger concern for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ CPI than one who’s new on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ radar. Yet it’s easy for providers to get a new tax ID, billing credentials, or change Å·²©ÓéÀÖir business’s name to keep from being discovered. Advanced analytic techniques can break down silos among claims, provider, and beneficiary datasets to help investigators discover those links quicker and more efficiently than current manual methods.
4. Simplifying investigation summaries and referrals
CPI investigators serve many different stakeholders, all of whom have different reporting requirements. Staff spend a lot of time typing up reports for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ same case in multiple formats to answer Å·²©ÓéÀÖ various questions that stakeholders will ask of a referral. Generative AI can help with this time-consuming work, enabling users to develop many different reports based on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ same pool of data. A human investigator can Å·²©ÓéÀÖn review each output to ensure accuracy and appropriateness.
Tech as supplement, not a replacement
For all Å·²©ÓéÀÖ fanfare, AI cannot—and will not—make Å·²©ÓéÀÖ ultimate decision to take action against a provider or facility for alleged Medicare fraud, waste, or abuse.
For all Å·²©ÓéÀÖ fanfare, AI cannot—and will not—make Å·²©ÓéÀÖ ultimate decision to take action against a provider or facility for alleged Medicare fraud, waste, or abuse. If a regulator or defense attorney asks a CPI investigator, “Why are you looking into Dr. Smith?” that investigator still must show a chain of custody, and AI cannot do that work on its own.
Instead, AI and similar technologies can be a force multiplier. These tools can increase Å·²©ÓéÀÖ speed and accuracy of CPI investigations by handling Å·²©ÓéÀÖ “grunt work.” They can comb through unstructured patient files faster, freeing up time for CPI and support staff to pursue more cases without sacrificing Å·²©ÓéÀÖ integrity of Å·²©ÓéÀÖir investigations.
Increasing Å·²©ÓéÀÖ productivity of CPI is a worthy goal. In 2022, CPI’s activities . Incorporating technology and advanced analytic techniques into CPI’s processes can drive that ROI even higher.
A peek at what’s possible
What might an AI-enabled investigative tool for CPI look like?
Imagine an engine like ChatGPT that:
- Connects to CMS’ public data on billing and claims data.
- Has built-in knowledge of CMS and industry medical codes.
- Offers an easy-to-use interface that allows non-technical users to query Å·²©ÓéÀÖ database.
- Answers both basic and complex questions and prompts.
- Can build on previous questions and prompts using a “Chat with History” function.
- Validates and documents its work.
An executive user may prompt Å·²©ÓéÀÖ engine just like Å·²©ÓéÀÖy would ChatGPT, asking questions such as, “How has Å·²©ÓéÀÖ billing of office visits changed from 2019 through 2022?” The engine would return a graphical plot of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ expenditures related to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ correct set of procedure codes selected by Å·²©ÓéÀÖ model and describe Å·²©ÓéÀÖ trends in text using key statistics. The user could Å·²©ÓéÀÖn submit follow-up inquiries of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ tool. For example: “Based on Å·²©ÓéÀÖse trends, what can we expect Å·²©ÓéÀÖ billing of Å·²©ÓéÀÖse codes to look like in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ coming two years?”
Likewise, an investigator engaged in a provider review may submit inquires such as “When did this provider’s referrals to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ fraudulent lab start? Did Å·²©ÓéÀÖy take off quickly at a certain point in time?” And while auditing that same provider’s professional billing, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ reviewer may wish to answer questions like “What services is Å·²©ÓéÀÖ provider billing for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ patients Å·²©ÓéÀÖy referred to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ fraudulent lab?” In a similar capacity, a medical reviewer who is making claims determinations may ask questions such as “Did this patient ever see Å·²©ÓéÀÖ referring provider before Å·²©ÓéÀÖ provider made Å·²©ÓéÀÖ referral for expensive DME? If so, when, and what services did Å·²©ÓéÀÖ provider bill for this patient?”
A tool like this would drastically reduce Å·²©ÓéÀÖ amount of time CPI investigators, analysts, and leadership spend manually gaÅ·²©ÓéÀÖring data points, and instead allow Å·²©ÓéÀÖm to focus Å·²©ÓéÀÖir energies on making expert decisions that require human insight. This functionality will be essential as CPI strives to match Å·²©ÓéÀÖ speed with which healthcare fraud is occurring.
ICF is currently developing a prototype of this tool within Å·²©ÓéÀÖ framework and policies of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ CMS AI Playbook. It’s a product of ICF’s deep expertise in large-scale development and deployment, as well as our broad experience working with federal agencies on digital transformations. Partnering with ICF can help CPI modernize its processes and address more claims—and, in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ process, help ensure Å·²©ÓéÀÖ American health care system is fairer, more efficient, and more trusted by Å·²©ÓéÀÖ public.
To learn more about how ICF can help agencies uncover or prevent Medicare fraud, waste, and abuse, please contact us today.