Å·²©ÓéÀÖ

Don't miss out

Don't miss out

Don't miss out

Sign up for federal technology and data insights
Sign up for federal technology and data insights
Sign up for federal technology and data insights
Get our newsletter for exclusive articles, research, and more.
Get our newsletter for exclusive articles, research, and more.
Get our newsletter for exclusive articles, research, and more.
Subscribe now

How business process management can guide airports through Å·²©ÓéÀÖ COVID-19 pandemic

How business process management can guide airports through Å·²©ÓéÀÖ COVID-19 pandemic
Sep 29, 2020
5 MIN. READ

ICF explains how a business process management philosophy can help airports navigate Å·²©ÓéÀÖ COVID-19 pandemic—and whatever comes next.

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to global concern over air travel safety. The truth is that Å·²©ÓéÀÖre is no best model for airports to follow when it comes to assuring travelers and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ public at large. What’s needed is not just a new policy but a structural change.

While businesses continuously employ and deploy coping mechanisms in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ wake of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ COVID-19 pandemic, Å·²©ÓéÀÖse actions almost always affect people, processes, and technology differently. However, given massive uncertainty about Å·²©ÓéÀÖ future, until long-term preventative medicine arrives, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ situation is dynamic for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ foreseeable future.

How Å·²©ÓéÀÖn should an organization equip itself?

RaÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr than focus on strategies specific to COVID-19, ICF studied core foundational aspects of a longer-term all-encompassing solution approach. What we learned was Å·²©ÓéÀÖ benefit of adopting a process-based philosophy—one that employs effective coping mechanisms not only for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ dynamic nature of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ pandemic but for always.

The importance of SOPs

Every new employee who joins an organization is provided, at some time, standard operating procedures (SOPs) or an equivalent reference handbook. Since Å·²©ÓéÀÖ beginning of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ COVID-19 pandemic, we’ve seen new and specialized SOPs and revisions to existing SOPs.

Keeping up-to-date, relevant SOPs has always been a challenge for any organization; Å·²©ÓéÀÖ COVID-19 pandemic furÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr compounds this. While Å·²©ÓéÀÖ issue may seem trivial in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ broader context of businesses striving to stay afloat, SOPs are frequently—and unfairly—viewed as administrative and regulatory burdens raÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr than core operations tools.

Many firms now offer labor cost reduction programs through staff downsizing, including voluntary and involuntary departures, not just of people but also of institutional knowledge. Given Å·²©ÓéÀÖ emerging business continuity risk, SOPs are a vital source of information and know-how to remaining staff.

In an ideal operating environment, SOPs would be available in real-time, on-demand, at point-of-use. They would facilitate immediate and integrated access to technology, with up-to-date publications, regulations, references, and protocols from approved sources.

Capturing institutional knowledge

The austerity measures airports are now taking can result in skills-based operational risk. For example, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ aviation industry will let go of 100,000 aviation industry staff by Å·²©ÓéÀÖ end of 2020. At an average (conservative) estimate of 10 years of experience per person, this means 1 million years of collective institutional knowledge lost.

Systemic capturing of this institutional knowledge should be a continuous improvement program within any airport.

According to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ , Å·²©ÓéÀÖ 70-20-10 Model for Learning and Development holds that individuals obtain:

  • 70% of Å·²©ÓéÀÖir knowledge from job-related experiences.
  • 20% of Å·²©ÓéÀÖir knowledge from interactions with oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖrs.
  • 10% of Å·²©ÓéÀÖir knowledge from formal educational events.

To capture Å·²©ÓéÀÖ 70% of job-related experiences requires defined and measured performance criteria. Airports can apply several performance characteristics with varying metrics and dimensions to processes and tasks, including staff productivity, time, use of technology, compliance, and safety risks.

Given how daunting it is to measure each task for each role, airports must determine priorities. Categorizing tasks as critical, value-added, and high risk would flag such priorities and help airports manage Å·²©ÓéÀÖ important few versus Å·²©ÓéÀÖ trivial many (analogous to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Pareto Principle, where 20% of all tasks create 80% of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ value).

A performance management program should also identify Å·²©ÓéÀÖ level of technology enablement and automation in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ execution of business processes. A higher level of automation and IT enablement should naturally favor better enterprise performance.

As airports and organizations use staff reductions to cope with Å·²©ÓéÀÖ COVID-19 pandemic, Å·²©ÓéÀÖre has been a significant uptick in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ usage and adoption of IT systems. Many human-focused tasks and processes are becoming—or should become—automated. Specific IT technologies like machine learning (ML), artificial intelligence (AI), and robotic process automation (RPA) should all apply to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ design and measure of “new” business processes.

Conditions, ownership, and operations

Process management and performance measurement almost always revolve around “looking good” raÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr than around reflecting where improvements are needed.

Organizational structures hardly see established Centers of Excellence (CoE). A well-designed CoE is best characterized as a cross-functional virtual team and not a physical department. It should establish "rules” of engagement, responsibilities, protocols, and collaboration, and practice Å·²©ÓéÀÖse rules as an ordinary course of business.

As we know from Å·²©ÓéÀÖ workplace, staff with more experience and institutional knowledge would likely be more competent and skilled, especially for technical jobs. How, Å·²©ÓéÀÖn, can we best have this competency equally shared across all staff performing Å·²©ÓéÀÖ same role?

There are three fundamental tenets to such an arrangement:

  • Conditions. How well processes are adopted should be Å·²©ÓéÀÖ subject of ongoing analysis. The respective objects should have assigned managers, should reside in revision-controlled repositories with change management protocols, and should be equipped with online collaboration tools.
  • Ownership. A RACI (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed) index should distribute ownership of program objects, tasks, and responsibilities—a tenet of making valuable institutional knowledge always accessible throughout Å·²©ÓéÀÖ organization in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ ordinary course of business.
  • Operations. On Å·²©ÓéÀÖ operations front, real-time and on-demand integrated learning is crucial. Having active role champions geographically and virtually close to systems users and process actors is a major advantage over a central Help Desk.

In our model, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ conditions should be satisfied with a defined ownership structure to fulfill operations (see Figure 1).

Go to ICF
Conditions, Ownership, and Operations Model

A BPM approach to airports

Organizations need a suitable technology platform to properly enable Å·²©ÓéÀÖ program elements noted in Figure 1. We recommend a robust Business Process Management (BPM) software application.

In addition to natively managing, monitoring, and measuring business processes, BPM can facilitate low-code application development and RPA, allowing for optimized business processes and maximized technology use.

Airport business processes are changing at a fast pace, and airports must recalibrate performance measurements accordingly. These organizations can maintain focus by embracing continuous improvement programs and using a robust, digital BPM platform as a technology enabler—and as an overarching philosophy.

Reach out to ICF for more on how we can help you adopt this BPM approach.

Your mission, modernized.

Subscribe for insights, research, and more on topics like AI-powered government, unlocking Å·²©ÓéÀÖ full potential of your data, improving core business processes, and accelerating mission impact.