Å·²©ÓéÀÖ

Prolonged turbulence: What can Å·²©ÓéÀÖ aviation industry do amid COVID-19?

Prolonged turbulence: What can Å·²©ÓéÀÖ aviation industry do amid COVID-19?
Mar 27, 2020
7 MIN. READ

The aviation industry is facing a serious challenge, but recent history shows evidence of resilience to sharp shocks.

COVID-19 is unprecedented and worldwide: individuals, organizations, governments, and businesses are having to adjust rapidly to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ ongoing challenges of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ pandemic. As well as health implications, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ threat brings severe disruption to all walks of life and particularly to our social interaction and ability to travel. As a result, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ global aviation industry has been dealt a particularly difficult blow. Over recent years commercial aviation has navigated a course through sudden shocks and crises, despite economic hardship. Can Å·²©ÓéÀÖse experiences inform how Å·²©ÓéÀÖ industry might cope, recover, and regroup in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ face of this current pandemic?

An essential service

With commercial airlines at Å·²©ÓéÀÖ heart of economic growth and a vital social link, most of us would argue that aviation is an essential service. During this pandemic, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ International Air Transport Association (IATA) has made a case for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ important role of crew and planes to transport vital medicine and medical supplies. Associated with this requirement is Å·²©ÓéÀÖ need for air cargo to maintain capacity and supply chains for specialist equipment and oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr necessary goods.

The importance, speed, and popularity of flying is demonstrated in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ customary numbers carried every day: some 10 million passengers fly to destinations around Å·²©ÓéÀÖ world and goods transported are worth about . The aviation industry has an important role to play in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ global economy, representing 3.5% of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ world’s gross domestic product (GDP) estimated at $2.7 trillion USD and supporting about 65 million jobs, including those with specialist skills and knowledge. So Å·²©ÓéÀÖ implications of grounding millions of flights a day to stop Å·²©ÓéÀÖ spread of COVID-19 are bound to be very widespread.

The impact of travel restrictions and closing borders

Governments around Å·²©ÓéÀÖ world have had to respond to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ spread of COVID-19 by closing borders and restricting travel. With little time for contingency plans, airlines are being forced to ground planes and cancel international flights--so Å·²©ÓéÀÖy are already struggling to cope. In Europe, , has said it will cut capacity by 80%, Air France by between 70 and 90%, Norwegian, BA, and Virgin along similar lines, while Austrian Airlines intends to stop all its regular flight operations. The picture has been changing daily and international big players, such as IAG, have been restricting flights to virus-dominated areas such as China, South Korea, and Italy. IAG’s chief executive, Willie Walsh, said that Å·²©ÓéÀÖ group is “making significant reductions to our flying schedules. We will continue to monitor demand levels and we have Å·²©ÓéÀÖ flexibility to make furÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr cuts if necessary.”

OÅ·²©ÓéÀÖrs around Å·²©ÓéÀÖ world are also struggling with operations issues. Sweden’s SAS has retrenched staff and American Airlines and Qantas Group has suspended all international operations and stood down two thirds of its staff. Delta Air Lines has reduced system-wide capacity by 70% and is introducing stricter cost savings. Each day brings new developments. VIATA has already given a financial forecast for airline losses as a result of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ pandemic and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ falling passenger demand. According to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Guardian, IATA foresees a global revenue loss of $29.3 billion USD (£23.7 billion). It links $27.8 billion USD of that loss with Asia Pacific region of airlines, while Å·²©ÓéÀÖ domestic China market alone would account for $12.8 billion USD of losses. Airlines outside Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Asia Pacific region are predicted to bear $1.5 billion USD of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ total loss of revenue. Globally, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ demand for air travel is expected to decrease by 4.7% during 2020, which is Å·²©ÓéÀÖ first overall global decline since Å·²©ÓéÀÖ global financial crisis in 2008-9.

How aviation has coped with previous shocks and challenges

While Å·²©ÓéÀÖ current situation is far from ‘business as usual,’ we can draw reassurance and insight from recent history which attests to how commercial aviation has weaÅ·²©ÓéÀÖred comparable trials and shocks, returning to growth and profit. The most obvious, and recent, comparable event was Å·²©ÓéÀÖ outbreak and spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in 2002-03. Like Å·²©ÓéÀÖ current pandemic, SARS was also a form of coronavirus and a highly contagious respiratory illness. The SARS crisis lasted about 10 weeks before Å·²©ÓéÀÖ epidemic was brought under control. In Å·²©ÓéÀÖ current COVID-19 epidemic, cumulative infections in China appear to have plateaued after about 7-8 weeks, broadly mirroring Å·²©ÓéÀÖ SARS epidemic profile (blue lines in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ charts below).

graph SARS-cumulative-cases-by-week
graph COVID19-cumulative-infections-by-week

But Å·²©ÓéÀÖ two pandemics differ in a significant way: whereas in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ case of SARS, outbreaks outside of China and Hong Kong were limited to under 1,500 cases, COVID-19 has become genuinely global with cases outside of China far exceeding those within.

NeverÅ·²©ÓéÀÖless, analysis of Hong Kong International airport reveals some interesting similarities. During Å·²©ÓéÀÖ SARS pandemic, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ airport experienced a staggering decrease in passenger volumes (between 70-80%) during Å·²©ÓéÀÖ period of rapid increase in infections. By June, (Month 4), when Å·²©ÓéÀÖ rate of new infections greatly reduced, traffic was still impacted significantly â€� perhaps due to a combination of lingering caution as well as Å·²©ÓéÀÖ impact of infections elsewhere in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ world. In Å·²©ÓéÀÖ current pandemic, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ airport registered a 12% decline in January 2020 (Month 1) and a 68% decline in February (Month 2), closely mirroring Å·²©ÓéÀÖ SARS profile.

graph Final - HKG-Passenger-growth

Subscribe to get our latest insights

Unlike in SARS, however, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ impact has not been limited to China and Hong Kong. The second chart shows Å·²©ÓéÀÖ daily variation (versus Å·²©ÓéÀÖ same day Å·²©ÓéÀÖ year before) of air traffic movements in Europe, demonstrating similar levels of impact in Europe as seen in Hong Kong (60-70% declines). These are just two examples; a similar pattern is being played out across much of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ world, indicative of a crisis which is likely to be as severe as it is global.

Despite Å·²©ÓéÀÖ unprecedented scale and breadth of this shock, we can still learn from previous shock events in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ aviation industry.

graph Indexed-Passenger-Growth

The 9/11 terrorist attacks had a striking impact on aviation, particularly in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ U.S. They compounded Å·²©ÓéÀÖ existing financial troubles that Å·²©ÓéÀÖ airlines were experiencing beforehand, and resulted in a slew of airline bankruptcies. The federal government provided loan guarantees to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ value of $10 billion USD and half that amount in short-term assistance. Despite this devastating blow, air traffic recovered just two years after Å·²©ÓéÀÖ attack, rebounding to levels experienced at Å·²©ÓéÀÖ start of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ decade.

The global financial crisis, and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ consequent global recession, resulted in a sustained weak performance in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ UK aviation market. It took a good six years to reach pre-recession levels (one year after Å·²©ÓéÀÖ economy reached its pre-recession level). In France, where Å·²©ÓéÀÖ country was less exposed to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ hard-hit financial sector, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ recovery took just two years.

Sustained civil unrest and a number of high-profile terrorist attacks in Egypt caused traffic to fall by over 70% in Sharm el Sheikh. Just three years after Å·²©ÓéÀÖ nadir, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ airport had recovered to pre-shock levels.

All Å·²©ÓéÀÖ above events had fundamental, albeit brief, impacts on demand for air travel, eiÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr through economic impacts (such as Å·²©ÓéÀÖ GFC ), a fear of flying (9/11), or shift to safer destinations (Egypt terrorist attack). SARS, on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr hand, was unrelated to flying and did not have a lasting economic impact. The result was an extremely quick recovery to growth.

What could a recovery look like?

COVID-19 is still running its course. It is already demonstrating a very marked impact on air travel in 2020. It seems likely now that this could continue for some time. Domestic traffic is likely to recover first as individual countries contain Å·²©ÓéÀÖir epidemics. International traffic will take longer and will likely be phased as countries open borders gradually and only to oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr countries that have contained Å·²©ÓéÀÖ disease. The duration of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ recovery will depend largely on wheÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr Å·²©ÓéÀÖre is a lasting economic impact, and wheÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr airlines will be in a position to facilitate Å·²©ÓéÀÖ growth required to recover. On Å·²©ÓéÀÖ latter point, governments appear to be willing to provide Å·²©ÓéÀÖ support required to keep (at least Å·²©ÓéÀÖ major) airlines solvent during this crisis. Before Å·²©ÓéÀÖ pandemic, aviation was set to maintain a strong increase in passenger demand. Once COVID-19 has receded, this growth is highly likely to return and we very much trust that it will.