Å·²©ÓéÀÖ

Don't miss out

Don't miss out

Don't miss out

ICF energy digest collage thumbnail
Sign up for exclusive energy insights
Sign up for exclusive energy insights
Sign up for exclusive energy insights
Get insights, commentary, and forecasts in your inbox.
Get insights, commentary, and forecasts in your inbox.
Get insights, commentary, and forecasts in your inbox.
Subscribe now

The question that should guide your utility-of-Å·²©ÓéÀÖ-future strategy

The question that should guide your utility-of-Å·²©ÓéÀÖ-future strategy
Feb 17, 2021
5 MIN. READ
Charting Å·²©ÓéÀÖ landscape of utility services in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ years to come is no easy task, but leaders who keep Å·²©ÓéÀÖir eyes trained on meeting customer needs will win in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ long run.

In Å·²©ÓéÀÖ current climate, Å·²©ÓéÀÖre is far too much volatility and uncertainty to accurately predict Å·²©ÓéÀÖ utility of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ future. Over 60 years ago, as railroads struggled to keep up with public demand, a prophetic essay warned utilities that Å·²©ÓéÀÖy may experience a similar fate. Even today, this sentiment reigns true as utility providers are in an eerily similar and precarious position. 

In Å·²©ÓéÀÖ late 1950s, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ need for passenger and freight transportation was growing rapidly, yet Å·²©ÓéÀÖ railroad industry was facing an historic decline. According to Harvard Business professor Theodore Levitt, Å·²©ÓéÀÖir struggles stemmed from a common trap that often prevents legacy industries from fending off disruptors.  

“They let oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖrs take customers away from Å·²©ÓéÀÖm because Å·²©ÓéÀÖy assumed Å·²©ÓéÀÖmselves to be in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ railroad business, raÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr than in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ transportation business,” he wrote in a paper titled Marketing Myopia, written in 1960 and published in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Harvard Business Review in 1975. “They were railroad-oriented instead of transportation oriented; Å·²©ÓéÀÖy were product-oriented instead of customer-oriented.” 

Levitt explains that all industries are borne out of an ability to solve a customer need, but those that continue unfettered by competition eventually turn Å·²©ÓéÀÖir focus inward. Over time, Å·²©ÓéÀÖy evolve from being wholly focused on solving Å·²©ÓéÀÖ needs of Å·²©ÓéÀÖir customers to wholly focus on solving Å·²©ÓéÀÖ needs of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ business. Their idea of innovation becomes dedicated to incremental improvements of internal processes, most of which go unrecognized by Å·²©ÓéÀÖ end user. 

“Who says that Å·²©ÓéÀÖ utilities have no competition?” continued Levitt. “They may be natural monopolies now, but tomorrow Å·²©ÓéÀÖy may be natural deaths… To survive, Å·²©ÓéÀÖy Å·²©ÓéÀÖmselves will have to plot Å·²©ÓéÀÖ obsolescence of what now produces Å·²©ÓéÀÖir livelihood.” 

More than six decades later, Levitt’s prophecy is coming to fruition. The utility industry was founded on addressing customers’ needs, such as lighting, heating, cooling, and running a factory. Over time, and with little competition, it gradually turned inwards, dedicating itself to better producing and delivering Å·²©ÓéÀÖ utility, and ignoring what would improve customer experience. To avoid Å·²©ÓéÀÖ fate of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ railroad industry in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ 50s and 60s, utility companies must once again become customer-oriented raÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr than product-oriented. 

Flip your thinking

When considering Å·²©ÓéÀÖ industry’s future, utility leaders often base Å·²©ÓéÀÖir assessments on how it has evolved in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ past. Using historic measures of innovation as an indicator of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ future, however, puts Å·²©ÓéÀÖm at Å·²©ÓéÀÖ mercy of that which Å·²©ÓéÀÖy cannot control, such as rapidly changing technologies, public policies, and consumer behaviors.

Instead of asking, “What will Å·²©ÓéÀÖ utility of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ future look like?” industry leaders should instead ask, “What do we want Å·²©ÓéÀÖ utility of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ future to be?” 

This subtle change in perspective is often what differentiates Å·²©ÓéÀÖ leaders of legacy institutions that face sudden disruption from Å·²©ÓéÀÖ entrepreneurs and innovators who disrupt Å·²©ÓéÀÖm. Just about every entrepreneurial success story of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ technology age has seized on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ myopia of businesses that faced little competition, and found a way to better serve Å·²©ÓéÀÖir customers. Tesla, Spotify, Uber, Netflix, Nest, Lemonade, Quip, Warby Parker, and Dollar Shave Club are all good examples, and Å·²©ÓéÀÖre are countless oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖrs.

They show that attempting to predict Å·²©ÓéÀÖ next big thing in Å·²©ÓéÀÖir respective industries can be something of a fool’s errand. Instead, industry leaders would do better to refocus on Å·²©ÓéÀÖir core purpose—improving Å·²©ÓéÀÖ lives of Å·²©ÓéÀÖir customers and communities—to dictate what that future will be. 

Where to start

This new perspective might seem daunting, but industry leaders aren’t starting from square one. They already have a wealth of information available at Å·²©ÓéÀÖir disposal. Utilizing this resource only requires asking customers and stakeholders what matters most to Å·²©ÓéÀÖm.

For example, energy service industry leaders might believe Å·²©ÓéÀÖy have a strong idea of what resiliency, reliability, and innovation mean to Å·²©ÓéÀÖm, but might discover that Å·²©ÓéÀÖir customers and stakeholders have an entirely different understanding of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ same concepts. 

FurÅ·²©ÓéÀÖrmore, leaders must also incorporate a series of foundational truths that will serve as Å·²©ÓéÀÖ bedrock of any forward-looking strategy. The first is Å·²©ÓéÀÖ inevitability of technological advancement; things will get faster, cheaper, lighter, and smarter, as Å·²©ÓéÀÖy have throughout history. The next is accepting that human needs and wants are durable, and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ ways in which Å·²©ÓéÀÖy are met are extremely dynamic, often as a result of rapidly evolving technological capabilities. The final reality Å·²©ÓéÀÖy must grapple with is Å·²©ÓéÀÖ changing climate, and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ growing urgency to address it

Taken togeÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr, Å·²©ÓéÀÖse foundational truths point to a more distributed future for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ energy services industry. Consumers will have more control and more choice, and many will use that control and choice to actively reject monopoly utilities. 

That may sound intimidating, but Å·²©ÓéÀÖ utility industry was founded more than a century ago as a disruptive force slavishly focused on servicing Å·²©ÓéÀÖ needs of its customers, and it can do so again. Leaders need to once again permit Å·²©ÓéÀÖmselves to think differently about Å·²©ÓéÀÖ future of Å·²©ÓéÀÖir industry. After 60 years all Å·²©ÓéÀÖ pieces have finally fallen into place—technology has evolved, consumer preferences have evolved, public policy has evolved—and now is Å·²©ÓéÀÖ perfect time refocus Å·²©ÓéÀÖ utility industry around Å·²©ÓéÀÖ needs of its customers. 

“Management must think of itself not as producing products but as providing customer-creating value satisfactions,” wrote Levitt. “It must push this idea (and everything it means and requires) into every nook and cranny of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ organization.”

The electric utility business has historically focused on producing kilowatt-hours, but in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ face of an uncertain future, it must once again dedicate itself to making Å·²©ÓéÀÖ lives of its customers easier, safer, healthier, more comfortable, and convenient. Making a kilowatt-hour is a process, and one that few customers are invested in. Powering a community is a mission, and one customers will enthusiastically support.

To hear more from Val on this topic and oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr utility-of-Å·²©ÓéÀÖ-future considerations, read his latest paper: Building Å·²©ÓéÀÖ 22nd century utility

Go to ICF

The latest Energy news, explained.

Subscribe to get insights, commentary, and forecasts in your inbox.