
Understanding Å·²©ÓéÀÖ natural gas (over)reaction to COVID-19 and oil prices
Most natural gas market observers believe that Å·²©ÓéÀÖ COVID-19 pandemic will result in a decline in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ production of associated gas due to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ collapse in oil prices and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ slowdown in drilling activity, as well as a decline in demand. Based on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ behavior of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ futures market, most participants in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ natural gas market expect Å·²©ÓéÀÖ decline in natural gas production to be more significant than Å·²©ÓéÀÖ decline in natural gas demand.
ICF believes Å·²©ÓéÀÖ market has gotten this balance wrong. ICF is currently forecasting that Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Henry Hub forward curve for this upcoming winter is, under normal weaÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr conditions, overpriced.
Over Å·²©ÓéÀÖ past two months, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Henry Hub forward curve for this coming winter (November 2020 to March 2021) has increased by $0.50/MMBtu. The market now expects Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Henry Hub natural gas price to be above $3.00/MMBtu in January and February of 2021. This would be a drastic change from Å·²©ÓéÀÖ $2.00/MMBtu average spot price for January 2020 and from Å·²©ÓéÀÖ roughly $2.60/MMBtu price that was expected for January and February 2021 as recently as Å·²©ÓéÀÖ beginning of February 2020.


Outlook for declining natural gas production
The increase in natural gas price expectations is directly tied to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ recent decline in oil prices. The West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil forward curve, as of April 27, 2020, shows sustained low prices of below $30.00/barrel through December 2020.
The collapse in oil prices is Å·²©ÓéÀÖ outcome of a dramatic reduction in petroleum product demand due to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ COVID-19 pandemic, combined with a global oversupply of crude oil. This collapse is expected to lead to significant reductions in North American oil production, as well as a corresponding decrease in associated natural gas production from regions where natural gas production is a byproduct of oil production.
The link between oil production and natural gas production has been increasing in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ last few years due to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ rapid pace of associated gas production growth in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ United States and Canada. This growth has allowed Å·²©ÓéÀÖ share of total production for associated gas to grow every year for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ past decade.
However, total associated gas production is still only 22% of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ total natural gas production in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ United States and Canada. This means a significant decline in associated natural gas production will have only a modest impact on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ overall natural gas production.
At current prices, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ associated natural gas production is adding significant value to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ oil wells with associated natural gas. As a result, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ value of production from Å·²©ÓéÀÖ oil wells with large volumes of associated natural gas is expected to be higher than Å·²©ÓéÀÖ value of oil wells with limited or no associated natural gas.
Although many oil producers have already announced oil well shut-ins in several plays like Bakken, Permian, Eagle Ford, and oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr regions, ICF expects that Å·²©ÓéÀÖ drop in associated gas production will be slower than what Å·²©ÓéÀÖ market is anticipating, thus limiting Å·²©ÓéÀÖ increase in natural gas prices this winter.
Modest, seasonal declines
Despite Å·²©ÓéÀÖ relative stability in natural gas prices, non-associated natural gas production is also expected to be down from Å·²©ÓéÀÖ previous forecasts. Natural gas exploration and development activity has been declining along with oil exploration and development activity. Total gas-directed drilling activity (measured by rig count) has dropped by more than 50% since Å·²©ÓéÀÖ start of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ year. However, much of this decline has been in western Canada, and reflects standard seasonal activity.
In Å·²©ÓéÀÖ oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr major natural gas plays, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ rig decline has been more modest. Non-associated gas production in key areas like Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Haynesville play (close to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Gulf Coast demand center) and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Marcellus play (close to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Midwest and East Coast demand centers) will persist.
This persistence is currently reflected in rig counts in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ United States and Canada, which have Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Marcellus and Haynesville rigs each accounting for one-third of active gas rigs, and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ aggregated Marcellus, Utica, and Haynesville rigs comprising 70% of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ total.


At current futures market prices, ICF believes that Å·²©ÓéÀÖ producers in economic dry gas plays like Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Marcellus and Haynesville plays will be incentivized to complete Å·²©ÓéÀÖir inventory of drilled but uncompleted (DUC) wells, and/or increase Å·²©ÓéÀÖir drilling activity—Å·²©ÓéÀÖreby offsetting Å·²©ÓéÀÖ production decline and limiting Å·²©ÓéÀÖ increase in natural gas prices.
Natural gas demand expected to decline
ICF expects significant reductions in near-term natural gas demand in response to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ COVID-19 pandemic. While we expect residential demand to remain relatively unchanged, we project peak losses of roughly 1 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) of commercial demand, 2 Bcf/d of industrial demand, 2 Bcf/d of demand for feedgas for liquefied natural gas (LNG) for exports, and 0.5 Bcf/d of demand for pipeline exports to Mexico. The decline in industrial demand includes a significant reduction in refinery demand for natural gas as lower demand for transportation fuels and oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr petroleum products also erodes Å·²©ÓéÀÖ demand for domestic refinery natural gas.
There is significant additional downside risk associated with LNG exports. While we have reduced our LNG export forecast by as much as 2 Bcf/d, U.S. LNG export costs are currently above international LNG prices, placing additional exports at risk. While LNG exports are supported by existing contracts, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ price relationship between LNG (based on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Henry Hub price of gas) and competing sources of international LNG (indexed to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Brent crude oil price) currently favors international sources of LNG supply.
The rapid recovery of prices in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ forward curve by July 2020 also appears to rely on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ forecasts of a V-shaped recovery in economic activity and demand, which seems to us optimistic. A prolonged loss in U.S. domestic demand and export demand, combined with storage levels now back above Å·²©ÓéÀÖ five-year average and without much loss in dry gas production, make Å·²©ÓéÀÖ over $0.20/MMBtu increase in prices between June and July unlikely.
While we are hopeful for a rebound in demand by this winter, we expect natural gas storage levels going into Å·²©ÓéÀÖ winter to be very high, holding down Å·²©ÓéÀÖ potential for a significant rebound in gas prices. We expect U.S. and Canadian storage levels to be above 4.3 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) going into this winter, which will hold down prices—even as expected production losses hit 6.5 Bcf/d.
Demand could recover just as production potential is at its lowest
While lower oil prices will lead to reductions in associated gas production, ICF does not anticipate that those reductions will occur soon enough to cause Å·²©ÓéÀÖ price impacts seen in this winter’s Henry Hub forward pricing. Instead, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ larger impacts are likely to be during Å·²©ÓéÀÖ following winter.
During Å·²©ÓéÀÖ summer of 2021, when demand for natural gas globally and in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ United States and Canada is expected to begin to recover more substantially, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ loss in gas supply from capital expenditure reductions by oil and gas producers will be at its peak. As a result, ICF forecasts that storage levels could be 1 Tcf lower going into Å·²©ÓéÀÖ winter of 2021/2022.


So, while production may be declining faster than demand, it is more likely that Å·²©ÓéÀÖ recovery in natural gas demand and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ loss of production combine to send gas above $3.00/MMBtu in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ winter of 2021/2022 instead of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ winter of 2020/2021.
In oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr words, as shown in ICF’s fundamentals-based forecast, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ forward curves for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ next two winters may need to be flipped.