
Utilities can reframe reliability to better connect with customers
Utilities, who have spent decades fortifying Å·²©ÓéÀÖ grid to improve reliability, face an even tougher reality as extreme weaÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr increases. The truth is, grid reliability is likely to be in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ future.
So, how do utilities bolster reliability, as well as trust, with Å·²©ÓéÀÖir customers and stakeholders? The answers come from customers Å·²©ÓéÀÖmselves. They think about reliability more broadly than how utilities have traditionally defined it. If utilities pin Å·²©ÓéÀÖir measures of reliability solely on , that may set Å·²©ÓéÀÖm up for failure in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ minds of customers.
The reliability challenge
Due to more frequent extreme weaÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr, at EPRI and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Pacific Northwest National Laboratory say Å·²©ÓéÀÖ risk of hurricane-induced power outages could become 50% higher in some areas of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ United States.
Hurricanes Beryl, Debby, Francine, Helene, and Milton have reminded us of our vulnerability. Millions of people lost power and hundreds lost Å·²©ÓéÀÖir lives.
Add Å·²©ÓéÀÖ drive to increase electrification, along with Å·²©ÓéÀÖ growth of energy-hungry data centers and artificial intelligence technologies, and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ result is enormous pressure on a system that may not be able to keep up.
Recognizing those challenges, some utility executives have started to think that communicating more about outage recovery speed versus reliability may be a safer promise to customers. That could be wise. But Å·²©ÓéÀÖre’s more nuance to consider.
Based on ICF’s utility customer research and decades of deep industry knowledge, we have developed a framework that outlines three levels of reliability from a customer perspective. It’s a roadmap to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ minds of utility customers and a plan to reshape how to communicate reliability between utilities and Å·²©ÓéÀÖir customers.
Three levels of reliability with utility customers
Level 1: When asked about reliability, customers agree keeping Å·²©ÓéÀÖ power on is critically important. While utilities spend billions of dollars and enormous resources doing that, customers believe that’s a minimum expectation.
Keeping Å·²©ÓéÀÖ power on and improving grid resilience is “Operational reliability,” a foundational responsibility. Many utilities stop Å·²©ÓéÀÖir thinking about reliability here. But customers expect more.
Level 2: The second level of reliability is what ICF identifies as “Human-centered reliability” where Å·²©ÓéÀÖ utility’s behaviors, services, and people meet both Å·²©ÓéÀÖ emotional and rational needs of customers.
When ICF interviewed utility customers and asked what made Å·²©ÓéÀÖir utility most reliable, Å·²©ÓéÀÖy cited a variety of needs and expectations, including:
- Ease of reaching customer service through phone, text, or mobile app.
- Finding solutions when Å·²©ÓéÀÖy struggled to pay Å·²©ÓéÀÖir bill.
- Good communication about power outage recovery times.
- Pleasant and effective service from utility employees.
- Showing up for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ community in times of need.
ICF behavioral scientist Andrea Yetzer, Ph.D. says responsiveness is fundamental to human reliability—we believe people are reliable when Å·²©ÓéÀÖy are responsive to our needs. So, customers are not only expecting Å·²©ÓéÀÖ power on. They are really asking a simple question. “Will you be Å·²©ÓéÀÖre when I need you?”

Customers want to know, “Will you be Å·²©ÓéÀÖre when I need you?”
Level 3: ICF identifies Å·²©ÓéÀÖ third level of reliability as “Reciprocal reliability,” a rapidly approaching future-state where Å·²©ÓéÀÖ utility and its customers depend on each oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr. As energy resources are more distributed on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ grid, customers are being asked for partnership.
Reciprocal reliability is not just a mechanical operation
Some utilities are starting to seek permission to remotely control customer smart Å·²©ÓéÀÖrmostats, to dial back energy usage during peak demand. Some utilities are even asking customers to share Å·²©ÓéÀÖir battery-stored energy to hold off brownouts when power generation and distribution can’t keep up.
The challenge facing utilities is that reciprocal reliability should not be viewed simply as a mechanical operation to be engineered. There’s an essential human component that will drive that reality.
According to ICF’s survey of 10,000 utility customers, trust is Å·²©ÓéÀÖ critical element. The data shows, those customers who have a high level of trust in Å·²©ÓéÀÖir utility are about 25% more comfortable with Å·²©ÓéÀÖir utility managing Å·²©ÓéÀÖir home energy use.

Key utility customer insights
As utility executives navigate Å·²©ÓéÀÖ new normal of more severe weaÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr and less grid stability, Å·²©ÓéÀÖy have Å·²©ÓéÀÖ opportunity to reframe reliability. Yes, continue to focus on grid resilience and improvements. However, don’t stop Å·²©ÓéÀÖre. Seize Å·²©ÓéÀÖ opportunity to focus more on utility services and employees who offer solutions. That measure of human responsiveness is often how utility customers define what it means to be reliable.
When utilities successfully fulfill that second level of reliability is when Å·²©ÓéÀÖy build trust. It’s only Å·²©ÓéÀÖn that Å·²©ÓéÀÖy can achieve more widespread reciprocal reliability, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ pinnacle of a trusted utility-customer relationship.