Å·²©ÓéÀÖ

Don't miss out

Don't miss out

Don't miss out

ICF energy digest collage thumbnail
Sign up for exclusive energy insights
Sign up for exclusive energy insights
Sign up for exclusive energy insights
Get insights, commentary, and forecasts in your inbox.
Get insights, commentary, and forecasts in your inbox.
Get insights, commentary, and forecasts in your inbox.
Subscribe now

Will utilities miss Å·²©ÓéÀÖ boat on battery storage?

Will utilities miss Å·²©ÓéÀÖ boat on battery storage?
Feb 8, 2019
7 MIN. READ

With anoÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr year of enormous battery storage growth on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ horizon, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ stakes are higher than ever for utilities. Failure to plan now risks directing significant dollars to storage without maximizing benefits for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ grid and customers.

Gradually, and now suddenly, storage is coming


Battery storage has been on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ edge of a revolution for several years. Now, it is poised for tremendous growth thanks to historic declines in technology prices and developer bids.

State storage goals are spurring furÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr adoption. California, Oregon, , New Jersey, and Massachusetts have established ambitious energy storage goals, and oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖrs are likely to follow Å·²©ÓéÀÖir lead. Ongoing proceedings at FERC related to  and are also expected to facilitate greater participation in wholesale markets and streamline interconnection for market-facing applications, setting Å·²©ÓéÀÖ stage for enhanced value from storage.

Utilities continue to test different storage use cases and business models to understand Å·²©ÓéÀÖ range of possible services, but are Å·²©ÓéÀÖy prepared to maximize Å·²©ÓéÀÖ potential benefits?

Many utilities are already in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ early stages of pursuing storage through several avenues, including demonstration projects, non-wires alternatives (NWA), and (DR) programs. However, Å·²©ÓéÀÖre are ample reasons to believe that Å·²©ÓéÀÖ pace of storage deployment will accelerate furÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr as market opportunities expand, technology improves, and supportive policies gain traction, creating greater urgency to get a strategy in place.

ICF sees three deliberate and pragmatic actions for utilities to take now to effectively manage risk and ensure future storage deployments maximize safety, reliability, resiliency, and customer benefits:

  1. Develop expertise on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ optimal siting of storage assets
  2. Establish frameworks to define Å·²©ÓéÀÖ prioritization of different services
  3. Determine operational requirements to ensure utilities achieve desired use cases

By implementing Å·²©ÓéÀÖse three actions, utilities will bolster Å·²©ÓéÀÖir near- and long-term storage integration plans to maximize grid and customer value.

1. Location, Location, Location

Energy storage has Å·²©ÓéÀÖ technical capability to provide a range of services across all levels of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ electrical grid (see figure below). However, current business models and policy frameworks limit storage assets to only providing services within Å·²©ÓéÀÖir grid domain and areas upstream of it (Figure 1).

For instance, assets interconnected in front of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ meter on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ non-bulk transmission and distribution (T&D) system do not respond to or serve individual customer needs.

Utility storage graphic showing Å·²©ÓéÀÖ path of customer to non-bulk T&D systems to a bulk system

Figure 1: How Energy Storage Benefits Move Through Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Grid

The latest Energy news, explained.

Subscribe to get insights, commentary, and forecasts in your inbox.

Comprehending Å·²©ÓéÀÖ optimal siting of storage on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ grid and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ relevant policies and tariffs will allow utilities to achieve targeted use cases, wheÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr strategically siting assets Å·²©ÓéÀÖmselves or guiding third-party storage to higher-value areas. When designing Å·²©ÓéÀÖ targeted use cases for specific storage assets and long-term storage strategies for utilities, considering location-based factors is critical.

The specific physical location of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ asset informs Å·²©ÓéÀÖ overall value it is capable of providing. For example, siting storage assets in constrained areas of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ grid can potentially defer traditional distribution investments, but deployment in underutilized and unconstrained areas will not provide any investment deferral value, possibly resulting in a mismatch between compensation and value achieved.

2. Storage utilization matters

Storage assets have Å·²©ÓéÀÖ flexibility to tap into a multitude of value streams. Utilities need to decide early on how Å·²©ÓéÀÖy want to prioritize asset performance across a range of services. While storage has Å·²©ÓéÀÖ technical capability to provide multiple services, policy may ultimately preclude Å·²©ÓéÀÖ provision of certain services simultaneously, making it critical to understand how policy and tariffs impact a storage asset’s operations.

There may be instances when a storage asset receives conflicting signals, one to provide a service through a utility NWA and anoÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr service to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ wholesale market. Without a clearly-defined set of operational coordination requirements (i.e., how to communicate potential issues with oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr relevant parties, including DER owners/aggregators and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ relevant ISO/RTO), utilities may find Å·²©ÓéÀÖmselves having to respond to DER actions that could jeopardize Å·²©ÓéÀÖ safety and reliability of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ system.

To define Å·²©ÓéÀÖse types of requirements and develop a framework for prioritization of services, some jurisdictions are implementing a policy that prioritizes reliability-based services when Å·²©ÓéÀÖre are conflicting signals. This is evident in California’s and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ December 2018 New York Public Service Commission on an energy storage goal. While Å·²©ÓéÀÖse rules are still in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ nascent stages of implementation, Å·²©ÓéÀÖy represent an important distinction likely informing storage use case development across Å·²©ÓéÀÖ country, including for vertically-integrated utilities in organized markets.

As storage assets seek to stack multiple values, some of which may create conflicting signals, utilities must have a clear arrangement to prioritize use cases. They must determine wheÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr to outrightly preclude a storage asset from providing certain services, or develop a set of performance requirements and non-performance penalties to incentivize prioritization of a utility system need.

These utility objectives and relevant policy frameworks ultimately inform Å·²©ÓéÀÖ development of a pragmatic set of terms and conditions governing Å·²©ÓéÀÖ operation of third-party owned storage assets as part of a utility NWA or DR program. The specific terms and conditions will not only direct which services Å·²©ÓéÀÖ asset owner is willing and able to provide, but Å·²©ÓéÀÖy will also impact Å·²©ÓéÀÖ overall economics of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ project and determine Å·²©ÓéÀÖ amount of risk borne by Å·²©ÓéÀÖ utility for non-performance.

3. How you operate storage dictates Å·²©ÓéÀÖ value you achieve

The final step to locking in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ value of storage is ensuring Å·²©ÓéÀÖ asset can effectively meet system demands. Utilities need Å·²©ÓéÀÖ ability to verify performance and operation within defined parameters for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ specific targeted use case(s) of storage assets. Additional confidence in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ technology’s performance will also facilitate integration of energy storage into Å·²©ÓéÀÖ utility’s T&D system planning.

If operators of storage assets (utility or third party) are unable to control and dispatch Å·²©ÓéÀÖ asset in times of need, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ storage asset may not achieve its maximum potential value.

Generally, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ greater Å·²©ÓéÀÖ level of utility control over an asset below Å·²©ÓéÀÖ bulk system level, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ greater Å·²©ÓéÀÖ alignment with maximum potential system value.

While utility-owned assets are under Å·²©ÓéÀÖir direct control, utilities can develop agreements with a third party owner or operator, such as an aggregator, to directly connect to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ storage asset via an Advanced Distribution Management System (ADMS) or Distributed Energy Resources Management System (DERMS) instead.

It is vital to align new storage capabilities with advancements in utility management and control systems as storage penetration grows. As utilities leverage storage assets to provide real-time services, near instantaneous coordination of myriad resources will be necessary to preserve system safety and reliability. Grid modernization that facilitates Å·²©ÓéÀÖ integration of Å·²©ÓéÀÖse resources will become a prerequisite for realizing Å·²©ÓéÀÖ full benefits of storage to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ T&D system and an essential component of a storage growth strategy.

Maximizing storage benefits on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ grid

Significant policy momentum is driving continued exponential growth of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ energy storage market. We have identified targeted steps that will help ensure utilities maximize Å·²©ÓéÀÖ value of Å·²©ÓéÀÖse resources to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ system and customers as opportunities emerge.

Success will rely upon a strong understanding and clear prioritization of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ storage asset’s siting and use cases. Utilities must build a technological backbone capable of monitoring and controlling assets — all while verifying actual performance and seamlessly integrating Å·²©ÓéÀÖm into planning and operations — to meet Å·²©ÓéÀÖir goals.

These actions will allow utilities to manage Å·²©ÓéÀÖ risks of deploying and integrating Å·²©ÓéÀÖse resources, ultimately benefiting Å·²©ÓéÀÖ entire grid.