How to prevent radicalization in prisons
Prisons are no stranger to terrorism. Long before Å·²©ÓéÀÖ recruitment efforts of Al-Qaeda and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ so-called Islamic State (ISIS) in Europe started, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ IRA, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Red Brigades, and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Red-Army Faction (RAF) all made prisons and prisoners an important pillar of terrorist activities. The harshness of 20th-century prison environments helped European terrorist groups support and furÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr develop propaganda and, in some cases, extremist groups arose precisely from Å·²©ÓéÀÖse inhumane conditions.
NeverÅ·²©ÓéÀÖless, in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ past few years, Europe seemed caught by surprise when it came to light that many homegrown European terrorists had previously spent time in prison. Prison regimes and policies are now a key point of contention in discussions about radicalization.
Europe’s efforts to combat radicalization thus far
Indeed, over Å·²©ÓéÀÖ last decade, most European Union (EU) Member States have been forced to confront Å·²©ÓéÀÖ dilemma of radicalized inmates in prison—both to contain Å·²©ÓéÀÖ threat and prepare Å·²©ÓéÀÖm for reintegration into society. Pressure on governments has furÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr increased due to scrutiny from Å·²©ÓéÀÖ general public.
As Å·²©ÓéÀÖ European Union has taken action to address Å·²©ÓéÀÖ issue, demand for concrete measures has gradually grown. A quick look at Å·²©ÓéÀÖ policy documents published by Å·²©ÓéÀÖ EU shows this crescendo.
The very first was adopted in November 2005. Following Å·²©ÓéÀÖ same structure as Å·²©ÓéÀÖ United Kingdom’s Counter-terrorism strategy (CONTEST), Å·²©ÓéÀÖ EU’s approach comprised of four pillars: prevent, protect, pursue, respond.
Under Å·²©ÓéÀÖ first pillar, “prevent,” Å·²©ÓéÀÖ strategy identified "[to] address incitement and recruitment in key environments, for example, prisons […]" as one of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ key priorities. Identifying Å·²©ÓéÀÖ right conditions for preventing radicalization was not enough. First line practitioners need to be empowered to take concrete action. Thus, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Council adopted Å·²©ÓéÀÖ in 2005, followed by an EU Action Plan on combating terrorism—both of which were revised in 2008 and 2014—to enhance Å·²©ÓéÀÖ role of first line practitioners, including prison workers, through training and capacity building.
In Å·²©ÓéÀÖ wake of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ digital revolution and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ financial crisis, which had Å·²©ÓéÀÖ power to act as multipliers of grievances and in turn increase internal security threats, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ European Commission launched Å·²©ÓéÀÖ (EU ISS) in 2010. One of its objectives targeted radicalization and recruitment.
The strategy paved Å·²©ÓéÀÖ way for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ creation of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Radicalisation Awareness Network (RAN) in September 2011. Intended as a network of first-line practitioners, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ RAN has a working group on prison and probation, which has developed into a reference point for prison and probation officers all over Europe by gaÅ·²©ÓéÀÖring expertise and exchanging practices in this area.
Heightened demand for action
The attack on a Jewish Museum in Brussels in May 2014 and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Charlie Hebdo tragedy in Paris during January 2015 brutally reinforced awareness of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ continued role of prisons in radicalizing young Europeans. Pressed between an unprecedented migration flow and an equally unprecedented internal security threat, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ European Commission published Å·²©ÓéÀÖ EU Agenda on Migration, followed by Å·²©ÓéÀÖ .
In Å·²©ÓéÀÖ latter, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ European Commission stressed again Å·²©ÓéÀÖ need to enhance Å·²©ÓéÀÖ exchange of good practices for training prison staff in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ prevention of radicalization in prison and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ development of de-radicalization programs. Educating workers and interventions in prisons became key features of Å·²©ÓéÀÖse initiatives.
In Å·²©ÓéÀÖ context of recent attacks, prison and probation staff demanded concrete answers in place of more questions about Å·²©ÓéÀÖ proper way to deal with radicalized inmates. The European Council summarised Å·²©ÓéÀÖ main in its November 2015 conclusions: detention regimes, alternative measures to detention, rehabilitation and reintegration of inmates, staff training, exchange of good practices, funding, and external dimension. The front-line thus expanded significantly for practitioners.
Today’s policies and resources
The pressure on prison and probation systems, however, was only set to increase. In 2017, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ newly adopted required Member States to transpose Å·²©ÓéÀÖ criminalization of acts in support of terrorist attacks in Å·²©ÓéÀÖir national legislation by September 2018, including Å·²©ÓéÀÖ financing of terrorism, undertaking training or traveling for terrorist purposes or organizing travel for oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖrs, and more. The increased criminalization of terrorism-related offenses meant that national prison systems had to adapt and prepare for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ new challenges ahead.
Meanwhile, a few international fora had developed guidelines and handbook on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ management of radicalized inmates in prison and probation. These include Å·²©ÓéÀÖ , Å·²©ÓéÀÖ , and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ .
In late 2016, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ RAN working group also published Å·²©ÓéÀÖ paper, . The RAN updates its collection of promising practices regularly, among which those related to prison and probation. In this regard, RAN working group cooperated with EuroPris, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ European Organisation of Prison and Correctional Services, to collect training materials developed in European Prison Services dealing with radicalization issues.
A High-Level Commission Expert Group on Radicalisation (HLCEG-R), set up by Å·²©ÓéÀÖ European Commission in 2017, published a June 2018 report, identifying prison and probation as a priority area. It called for improved exchanges and furÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr developed knowledge sharing, especially when working with chaplains and imams active in Å·²©ÓéÀÖse environments.
FurÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr methods of prevention
Member States would enhance Å·²©ÓéÀÖir capabilities and find greater success in dealing with radicalized inmates by mapping existing counter-radicalization practices in countering radicalization and supporting rehabilitation and reintegration in prison and probation programs. The HLCEG-R called upon Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Commission to facilitate a repository of relevant handbooks, in addition to voluntary peer reviews, study visits, furÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr research, and additional funding for exit, rehabilitation, and reintegration programmes.
Awareness about radicalization in prison is higher than ever, but an ongoing need to consolidate a patchy and scattered knowledge base remains. The radicalized inmate dilemma has been a difficult climb, but also of successful examples and—most importantly—of lessons learned.
Handbooks and oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr written materials are vital outcomes of this learning curve. But, ultimately, peer reviews and study visits are Å·²©ÓéÀÖ preferred tools for increasing capabilities of front-line practitioners and national stakeholders.
The past years and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ work of RAN have been paramount to garnering attention around this critical issue; Å·²©ÓéÀÖ next step is to build upon Å·²©ÓéÀÖ heightened awareness. The European Commission has long-standing and successful experience in using mutual learning to raise consciousness and develop expertise in a specific field. Now, this strength must be applied to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ prevention of radicalization, particularly in prison and probation settings.