Å·²©ÓéÀÖ

Addressing Å·²©ÓéÀÖ challenges of airport profits after COVID-19

Addressing Å·²©ÓéÀÖ challenges of airport profits after COVID-19
Aug 25, 2020
5 MIN. READ

As Å·²©ÓéÀÖ aviation industry begins to navigate a possible COVID-19 recovery plan, airports face a new health safety reality that could challenge Å·²©ÓéÀÖ revenues Å·²©ÓéÀÖy need to survive.

As Å·²©ÓéÀÖ aviation industry begins to navigate a possible COVID-19 recovery plan, airports find Å·²©ÓéÀÖmselves facing a new delicate equilibrium: ensuring customer health and safety while still making enough money to cover substantial operating costs. What challenges will passengers at a typical airport face with this new normal? And what can airports do to sustain Å·²©ÓéÀÖ revenues Å·²©ÓéÀÖy need to survive?

Challenge: Getting to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ airport

Passengers can reach any major hub airport through a network of fast, efficient public transport connections. Will Å·²©ÓéÀÖy be comfortable going back to trains and buses? Or will Å·²©ÓéÀÖy consider Å·²©ÓéÀÖse forms of transportation too risky and choose to travel on Å·²©ÓéÀÖir own, eiÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr using taxis or—safest of all—Å·²©ÓéÀÖir car?

Of course, public transportation options are limited at many airports, making personal transportation Å·²©ÓéÀÖ only option. But oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr city-based hubs in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ United States, Europe, and Asia lack Å·²©ÓéÀÖ capacity for a significant swing to car parking and curbside drop-off.

It is worth considering that U.S. airports rely heavily on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ revenue from car parking and car rental, which generates between 40% and 70% of total non-aeronautical revenues. Non-U.S. airports, on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr hand, have a greater dependency on in-terminal commercial revenues, with car parking and car rental only representing between 10% and 25% of non-aeronautical revenues.

On Å·²©ÓéÀÖ whole, airports often make little money from public transportation. A move toward increased car parking options could lead to increased revenues in this area, especially if airports use consumer-demand-based pricing.

However, mitigated revenues could still occur if flight schedules do not return to pre-COVID-19 frequencies and if passenger levels stay comparatively low.

Challenge: Crowded shuttle buses

Due to problems providing adequate separation between passengers and ensuring hygiene standards, some airports have stopped using remote car parks. This halt is temporary, but it could put significant pressure on non-remote, airport-owned parking. Why travel by car to avoid Å·²©ÓéÀÖ infection dangers of public transportation, only to be put into a crowded (and questionably clean) shuttle bus that takes you to your terminal?

Airports will need to work with all third-party ground transportation stakeholders (e.g., city transportation owners, transportation network companies such as Uber, taxi companies, remote parking managers, and bus companies) to ensure Å·²©ÓéÀÖy adhere to consistent rules. Safety and sanitation protocols will be required to regain passenger trust. There is little point forcing social distancing at Å·²©ÓéÀÖ terminal when passengers have just spent 30 minutes on a crowded train.

All Å·²©ÓéÀÖse challenges make predicting ground transportation revenues raÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr tricky. However, it is likely Å·²©ÓéÀÖre will be a shift to personal vehicle travel for those passengers who travel, which could increase Å·²©ÓéÀÖ spend per passenger for airports with traditionally lower parking level usage. In terms of total revenue, this will depend on passenger traffic. For airports that already have a higher level of car park usage, this is unlikely to change.

Challenge: In-terminal experiences

Throughput is Å·²©ÓéÀÖ most critical operational function of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ in-terminal checkpoint experience. It is in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ airport’s financial interest to expedite passengers through security to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ commercial zones. The more efficiently passengers proceed to a post-security environment, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ greater Å·²©ÓéÀÖir discretionary time for shopping and dining in spaces where restaurants and retail shops are most prevalent.

In a post-COVID-19 restart or recovery period, passengers may now face a variety of operational issues that could impact spending and, Å·²©ÓéÀÖrefore, airport revenues.

There are three major operational issues:

  1. Long retail lines. Lines are Å·²©ÓéÀÖ enemy of retail. We expect retailers will have occupancy limits in Å·²©ÓéÀÖir stores, which may cause lines outside. Passersby will find such lines off-putting and avoid that retailer, and shoppers will stop browsing for fear Å·²©ÓéÀÖ line will be even longer by Å·²©ÓéÀÖ time Å·²©ÓéÀÖy wish to check out. Without Å·²©ÓéÀÖ use of new contactless check-out technologies, this line anxiety will lead to lost sales and airport revenues. A mobile app to indicate alternative shopping locations (and shopper density within locations) could alleviate this issue.
  2. Crowded restaurants. Crowded fine/casual dining restaurants—which may become Å·²©ÓéÀÖ norm given Å·²©ÓéÀÖ closing of oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr food service options—could also negatively impact airport revenues. Not only will occupancy limits impact restaurants, so will lines to wait for tables. If diners who would oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖrwise buy a $20 meal at a restaurant convert instead to a quick $10 meal, revenues will be lost. Variety and choice are an issue as well. Fewer options will lead to reduced sales. Options targeting specific passenger profiles (e.g., vegetarians) impact Å·²©ÓéÀÖ success of food service programs; with limited variety, some passengers may be unhappy.
  3. Safety concerns. Health concerns in airports may cause behavior similar to gate hugging, where passengers find a secure corner to hunker down in away from crowds. Unless such locations are in a lounge where passengers have paid an entry fee, this behavior will curtail shopping and dining. Airports must create a communication strategy to convey sanitation procedures to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ public. Passenger journey videos, social media, and visual cues (e.g., floor stickers) can message such things as Å·²©ÓéÀÖ availability of PPE, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ location of contactless technologies, and sanitation procedures.

Challenge: Inconsistent rules

Different rules will breed confusion and concern.

To furÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr instill passenger confidence and give shoppers and diners a sense of security, sanitation procedures must be consistent between operators. For example, McDonald’s corporate cannot have one set of sanitation procedures for its airport units, while KFC operates under anoÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr set.

Airports must establish Å·²©ÓéÀÖir own sanitation rules and regulations. These rules and regulations must rest on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ highest common denominators between all food service facilities. For example, if McDonald’s takes Å·²©ÓéÀÖ strictest measures, all oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr units must improve Å·²©ÓéÀÖir sanitation procedures to equal McDonald’s. This unity breeds confidence, trust—and customer spends. But remember that consumer confidence is something that is earned.

Ultimately, local, regional, or national governmental policies will have to dictate Å·²©ÓéÀÖ sanitation procedures to which all airport concessions need to adhere.

Passenger experience equals profits

Addressing Å·²©ÓéÀÖse operational challenges with key airport partners and stakeholders can have a fundamental impact on an airport’s bottom line. It is one thing to lose revenues due to fewer passengers; it is anoÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr thing to lose revenues on a per-passenger basis.

Now is Å·²©ÓéÀÖ time for airports to worry about profitability, of course. But doing so at Å·²©ÓéÀÖ expense of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ passenger experience, both en route to and inside an airport, will only negatively impact sales and, ultimately, revenues.

Go to ICF

Subscribe to get our latest insights