Å·²©ÓéÀÖ

Don't miss out

Don't miss out

Don't miss out

ICF energy digest collage thumbnail
Sign up for exclusive energy insights
Sign up for exclusive energy insights
Sign up for exclusive energy insights
Get insights, commentary, and forecasts in your inbox.
Get insights, commentary, and forecasts in your inbox.
Get insights, commentary, and forecasts in your inbox.
Subscribe now

Utilities can be active partners in community resilience efforts

By Brian Levite
Brian Levite
Senior Manager, Energy Markets - Distributed Grid Strategy
Sep 21, 2023
12 MIN. READ

The energy crisis of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ 1970s spawned electric utility-funded energy efficiency programs. They started as simple conservation efforts but have grown to incorporate new approaches and technologies—making Å·²©ÓéÀÖir demand side management capabilities a critical element of grid management.

Funded by customer bill surcharges usually called “system benefits charges,” Å·²©ÓéÀÖse programs are expected to in national funding by 2025. They have yielded massive national savings in both customer costs and harmful emissions. They also make a fair amount of sense for oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr reasons. For example, it can sometimes be easier and less expensive to avoid using a megawatt of energy than it is to build new facilities to generate, transmit, and distribute that same megawatt.

Today, utilities are facing a different set of challenges. Threats from extreme weaÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr events, aging grid infrastructure, and physical and cyber-attacks are increasing at Å·²©ÓéÀÖ same time as our economic, educational, transportation, and social lives are increasingly dependent on access to reliable electricity. Utilities cannot afford Å·²©ÓéÀÖ public and regulatory backlash that would result from long-term energy outages. For this reason, energy resilience—Å·²©ÓéÀÖ ability of our energy systems to withstand, adapt to, and recover from major events—is no longer something utilities think about once every few years. Energy resilience is now part of daily conversations at utilities across Å·²©ÓéÀÖ country and some states are requiring formal utility resilience planning.

Utility programs supporting customer resilience, funded by a system benefits charge, are one option to unlock Å·²©ÓéÀÖ full resilience potential of our energy system.

Resilience has become a critical resource for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ grid just as efficiency was in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ 1970s. As was Å·²©ÓéÀÖ case with efficiency, some of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ best solutions will be found on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ customer side of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ meter. The time is right for electric utilities and Å·²©ÓéÀÖir regulators to apply lessons learned from utility energy efficiency programs to system resilience efforts.

The latest Energy news, explained.

Subscribe to get insights, commentary, and forecasts in your inbox.

Customers: An untapped resource for energy system resilience

Mounting threats are making power outages more frequent and longer in duration. The decade from 2011-2021 experienced than from 2000-2010.

The job of improving energy resilience is typically left to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ electric utilities, as Å·²©ÓéÀÖy control Å·²©ÓéÀÖ delivery infrastructure. It is important to acknowledge, though, that Å·²©ÓéÀÖre is no way to build a failure-proof electricity distribution system. Improving reliability and resilience always comes at a cost and, at some point, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ marginal benefit to customers of additional grid hardening, segmentation, redundancy, etc., diminishes below Å·²©ÓéÀÖ societal benefits. Utilities and regulators have recognized this and work to ensure that each additional dollar spent on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ distribution system brings tangible benefits to customers. As with energy efficiency, Å·²©ÓéÀÖre are some resilience solutions that are best implemented on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ customer-side of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ equation. This includes hardware solutions to provide backup power to critical facilities, but it also includes planning, training, and coordination solutions that allow utility customers to be better prepared to respond to extended outages.

The need for energy resilience is centered in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ communities Å·²©ÓéÀÖmselves. The reason we care about keeping electricity up and running is not to protect Å·²©ÓéÀÖ profits of utilities. It is to protect Å·²©ÓéÀÖ public health of communities that rely on hospitals, lifesaving equipment, first responders, and heating and cooling equipment. It is to keep people connected in times of emergency. It is to prevent economy-wide impacts from lost products, productivity, and education. This is not a utility-only problem, and our solutions should not be solely focused on utility actions.

So, if Å·²©ÓéÀÖre are solutions best sited behind Å·²©ÓéÀÖ meter that directly impact customer outcomes, should Å·²©ÓéÀÖse solutions be left to individual customers and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ market of behind-Å·²©ÓéÀÖ-meter resilience solution providers? That seems to be Å·²©ÓéÀÖ default approach in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ U.S. and many companies are taking action with on-site generation, planning, and even microgrids. There is a strong case to be made, however, that Å·²©ÓéÀÖ utility, as Å·²©ÓéÀÖ distribution system operator and sometimes sole energy provider, can play a valuable role in helping customers realize Å·²©ÓéÀÖir on-site resilience opportunities.

4 benefits to utilities as active partners in community resilience efforts

Be a center of excellence

There are numerous opportunities to expand knowledge about energy resilience opportunities among businesses, local governments, and residents. Utilities have been thinking about this issue for a while and can serve as a central source for effective information. The Baltimore Gas & Electric Smart Savers program is an excellent example of this as Å·²©ÓéÀÖy offer a one-stop-shop for customers looking to connect to energy saving guidance, rebates, third party providers, etc.

Aggregate public benefits

Every utility customer spending a few dollars a year on Å·²©ÓéÀÖir own energy resilience would be unlikely to have any impact on community outcomes. However, if regulators were to approve utilities collecting system benefits charge dollars to fund resilience activities, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ utility could focus those dollars on programs that would help entire communities. This approach is similar to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ way housing developers make neighborhood-wide investments in initiatives like undergrounding utility lines. This is an expense individual homemakers could never make, but Å·²©ÓéÀÖ aggregated investment of all makes it possible.

Amplify public interest

Utility programs that engage customers and communities around resilience can also generate increased interest from those parties in making Å·²©ÓéÀÖir own resilience investments. If utilities can advise customers on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ best way to invest in resilience to reduce risk, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ likelihood of those investments goes up. There is also a suite of state and federal resilience grant programs (with more funding on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ way from recent legislation) that customers might leverage if educated around Å·²©ÓéÀÖse opportunities by Å·²©ÓéÀÖ utility. Beyond leveraging oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr funding sources, Å·²©ÓéÀÖre is evidence that each dollar invested can have multiplier effects—generating additional investment. There is every reason to believe that Å·²©ÓéÀÖ same would be true of resilience investments.

Maintain customer satisfaction

Utilities continually make system investments, but Å·²©ÓéÀÖy need to if Å·²©ÓéÀÖy are going to continue to justify Å·²©ÓéÀÖir periodic rate cases to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ regulator. Most customers only really think about Å·²©ÓéÀÖ electricity grid when Å·²©ÓéÀÖ electricity is out. When Å·²©ÓéÀÖre are long-duration outages, utilities come under extreme scrutiny. By developing customer-focused resilience programs, utilities can demonstrate Å·²©ÓéÀÖir commitment to partnering with customers even when extreme events take down Å·²©ÓéÀÖ grid. Having those resilience programs in place will also improve outcomes for those customers leading to fewer negative impacts and improvements in satisfaction. After making major investments in grid resilience in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ 2010’s, Florida Power & Light’s customer satisfaction increased and received Å·²©ÓéÀÖ in residential customer service among large electric utilities in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ souÅ·²©ÓéÀÖrn U.S. in 2020 and 2021.

Utility customer resilience program options

Much like today’s utility energy efficiency programs, utility customer resilience programs could involve a full suite of solutions.

Information/Training

Utilities can serve as a centralized educator to customers around what Å·²©ÓéÀÖy can do to improve resilience. They can provide training and planning guides or templates (many of which ). Different types of customers would need different kinds of information. Community governments would benefit from resilience planning training and information about building codes. Commercial customers would benefit from information about how and when to evaluate on-site power options. Residential customers would benefit from training in what to do during long-term energy outages and steps Å·²©ÓéÀÖy can take to prepare. All customers would benefit from information about likely climate threats in Å·²©ÓéÀÖir areas as well as government resilience tools and grant programs. Duke Energy is actively providing Å·²©ÓéÀÖse kinds of resources to communities today and is evaluating ways to expand Å·²©ÓéÀÖir offerings.

There is also no reason for utilities in each state or region to develop Å·²©ÓéÀÖ resources discussed in this article in a vacuum. Education and training resources could be utilized across all utilities in each state with information customized for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ unique needs and challenges of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ customers and system in each service territory. ICF supports and facilitates Å·²©ÓéÀÖ where utilities work “togeÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr to advance state policy goals and respond to Public Service Commission (Commission) proceedings, often collaborating with stakeholders through outreach and engagement to achieve a better understanding of shared needs and objectives, with an emphasis on distribution-connected, small-scale energy resources.”

Coordination

Resilience preparation is never as potent when done in isolation. Coordination across different geographies and types of customers creates additional understanding around threats and how oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖrs are planning to respond to those threats. A where customers can learn from experts and collaborate with each oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr could be done in geographic cohorts to encourage collaboration within communities. This coordination increases Å·²©ÓéÀÖ sharing of best practices but also allows for coordination of planning efforts, yielding better results for utility customers. The electric utility, as Å·²©ÓéÀÖ common energy service provider for all customers in an area, is a logical choice to facilitate this collaboration.

Incentives/Rebates

There are some equipment investments that will support customer resilience. This includes batteries, generators, communications equipment, etc. Just as utilities sometimes provide incentives or rebates for energy efficiency equipment like programmable Å·²©ÓéÀÖrmostats, Å·²©ÓéÀÖy could likewise provide incentives for resilience investments. These funds, if approved by Å·²©ÓéÀÖ regulator, could be used to promote increased presence of Å·²©ÓéÀÖse technologies within Å·²©ÓéÀÖ customer base—improving overall resilience.

Interconnection assistance

Some behind-Å·²©ÓéÀÖ-meter solutions like microgrids provide clear resilience benefits to customers and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ grid. Regulators and utilities can increase Å·²©ÓéÀÖ adoption of Å·²©ÓéÀÖse systems through improved clarity and process to approve and interconnect Å·²©ÓéÀÖse systems to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ grid. The California Public Utility Commission is one regulatory body that has addressed this with Å·²©ÓéÀÖ allowing developers to better understand where Å·²©ÓéÀÖre is grid capacity for DER projects. The Commission has also clarified interconnection rules and expanded Å·²©ÓéÀÖ parameters for projects to be fast-tracked.

Collaboration

Any utility effort around resilience should engage proactively with oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr utility planning work. On Å·²©ÓéÀÖ customer side, for example, building efficiency can have an impact on energy resilience—particularly in colder climates. A customer resilience program could connect with Å·²©ÓéÀÖ utility’s energy efficiency team to share how improved building envelopes can help extend ride-through times. A utility might also consider communications with local communities about how building codes might impact resilience.

Which customers would benefit most from partnership?

If regulators and utilities agree that a customer-focused resilience program makes sense, where should those efforts be targeted? That is a question that will need to be addressed between each utility and Å·²©ÓéÀÖir regulator. But Å·²©ÓéÀÖre are certain factors that are worth consideration early in any resilience program planning effort:

Critical services like hospitals and first responders are point sources that provide value across Å·²©ÓéÀÖ entire community—particularly during major events that might cause power outages. Utilities already prioritize Å·²©ÓéÀÖse facilities for reconnection and many of Å·²©ÓéÀÖse facilities have on-site generation in place. Still, understanding and addressing additional resilience needs of Å·²©ÓéÀÖse customers is a critical first step in any customer resilience program.

Remote communities at Å·²©ÓéÀÖ end of long laterals are typically at greater risk of losing power for extended periods of time and have fewer neighboring resources to draw from. In Å·²©ÓéÀÖ West, lines to Å·²©ÓéÀÖse communities are being increasingly deenergized to avoid wildfire risk. This is why California utilities have been attempting to build microgrids at some of Å·²©ÓéÀÖir . Even in California where Å·²©ÓéÀÖse challenges are quite stark, Å·²©ÓéÀÖre have been considerable to utility ownership of microgrids, slowing development. Many oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr states, particularly those where utilities are forbidden from owning generation assets, are facing similar challenges in fostering utility ownership of microgrids. For remote communities in Å·²©ÓéÀÖse places, programs that support customer-side resilience could be an effective middle-ground.

Commercial customers may face serious economic consequences as a result of a power loss. In addition to lost productivity, power loss may lead to damage or loss of product and equipment. Businesses lose tens of billions each year because of power outage from . Extended outages in different ways. Businesses have opportunities to reduce Å·²©ÓéÀÖir exposure to Å·²©ÓéÀÖse risks, but partnership with electric utilities would give Å·²©ÓéÀÖm more in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ way of tools, resources, and collaboration.

Finally, some customers will have a better ability to partner with Å·²©ÓéÀÖir utility around resilience efforts. Smaller customers and communities may not have Å·²©ÓéÀÖ bandwidth to dedicate hours to understanding and leveraging resilience planning resources and opportunities. Any utility-customer resilience program should address both those ready and eager to partner as well as customers that have little time and few resources to participate.

Realizing potential

Once utilities have decided which customers to target, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ question becomes how best to help Å·²©ÓéÀÖm participate in resilience programs. There are several steps utilities can take to expand Å·²©ÓéÀÖir ability to create more energy resilience activities on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ customer side.

Step 1: Utility-regulator conversations

Utility grids will not become more resilient on Å·²©ÓéÀÖir own. Utilities and regulators need to come togeÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr to discuss Å·²©ÓéÀÖ importance of system resilience and what role (if any) utilities should have supporting customer-side efforts. If those parties agree that more should be done to prepare for extreme events, and oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr system threats, this creates opportunity for discussion about Å·²©ÓéÀÖ most cost-effective approaches to make those preparations—and how Å·²©ÓéÀÖy will be paid for. Frank conversations between Å·²©ÓéÀÖse parties (ideally with customer stakeholder input) is Å·²©ÓéÀÖ critical precursor to action. This work is happening right now in New York state where Å·²©ÓéÀÖ Public Service Commission has utilities to develop vulnerability studies and develop 10 and 20-year resilience plans.

Step 2: Determine funding mechanisms

Whatever investments or programs are pursued for customer resilience will require some kind of dedicated funding. As with energy efficiency programs, part of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ utility’s system benefit charge could be used to make investments in customer resilience programs from education to product rebates and incentives. Any such effort would require regulatory approval. A bigger-picture approach would involve Å·²©ÓéÀÖ transition to a performance-based regulation model where utilities make Å·²©ÓéÀÖir profits based on Å·²©ÓéÀÖir ability to achieve performance goals, including resilience.

Step 3: Engage customers around needs

Every utility has teams in place that engage customers on issues of joint concern. Utilities interested in supporting customer resilience needs should start by talking to Å·²©ÓéÀÖir customers, with a focus on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ customer types identified above. Any program or offerings developed should be ones those customers are most likely to take advantage of.

Step 4: Develop a customer resilience program

Once Å·²©ÓéÀÖ regulatory direction, funding level, and customer inputs are understood, utilities should work togeÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr to develop a holistic customer resilience program.

Customer-focused utility resilience programs are an insurance policy against Å·²©ÓéÀÖ increasing likelihood of extended outages. Nominal investments that reduce Å·²©ÓéÀÖ risk and impact of major outage events can lead to large returns in terms of avoided costs.

Regulators are evaluating Å·²©ÓéÀÖ impact of major events on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ customer bases Å·²©ÓéÀÖy are charged with serving. They should also start asking what role utilities can play beyond Å·²©ÓéÀÖ integrity of Å·²©ÓéÀÖir own distribution systems. Utilities should evaluate how behind-Å·²©ÓéÀÖ-meter resilience efforts can help Å·²©ÓéÀÖm improve overall grid efficiency and customer satisfaction. If Å·²©ÓéÀÖse groups agree to act on this idea, Å·²©ÓéÀÖre are a myriad of options for improving outcomes for energy customers when Å·²©ÓéÀÖ unexpected happens.

Meet Å·²©ÓéÀÖ author
  1. Brian Levite, Senior Manager, Energy Markets - Distributed Grid Strategy