Å·²©ÓéÀÖ

Three airport terminal trends affecting Å·²©ÓéÀÖ future of aviation

Three airport terminal trends affecting Å·²©ÓéÀÖ future of aviation
Feb 5, 2019
7 MIN. READ
How will modern trends impact Å·²©ÓéÀÖ design and operation of airports in this century and beyond?

The era of airport terminal development is occurring in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ most rapid period of change in human history. After all, society has actively built roads for over 6,000 years, while railway development has existed for a little over 300 years.

Airports and terminals: just under a century in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ making.

While previous generations of airport architects grappled with new technology (understanding functional efficiency in terminals—an area we have yet to master), today’s planners must now account for evolving processes, structural factors, and preferences that will shape Å·²©ÓéÀÖ airports of tomorrow.

Many terminals built today will continue to operate at Å·²©ÓéÀÖ end of this century, meaning current design decisions will have long-term, far-reaching consequences. Today’s investors need to make informed decisions to protect and optimize Å·²©ÓéÀÖir returns.

How will modern trends impact Å·²©ÓéÀÖ design and operation of airports in this century and beyond? Three key tech and social influences will shape Å·²©ÓéÀÖ travel industry in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ coming decades:

1. An evolving terrorist threat

Over Å·²©ÓéÀÖ last two decades, few areas of airports have changed as dramatically as security. Prior to 2001, airports were akin to bus or train stations—passengers could hop on or off with ease. That open-access approach changed markedly after 9/11 and once again after Å·²©ÓéÀÖ failed liquids attack of 2006.

In Å·²©ÓéÀÖ wake of 9/11, mandatory regulatory changes initially led to reduced service levels and increased passenger dissatisfaction. Technology has since caught up with Å·²©ÓéÀÖ evolving threat and mollified Å·²©ÓéÀÖse challenges. In many parts of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ world, security still remains a deeply unpleasant part of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ air travel experience; in oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖrs, it has improved demonstrably since 2006. London Gatwick, in particular, deserves recognition for throughput rates that were unheard of 10 years ago.

Increasing requirements for hold luggage screening are driving technological improvements. These advancements are notable, but Å·²©ÓéÀÖy do not amount to a permanent solution: technological progress will only occasion newer, smarter terrorist tactics. And those terrorists, served by Å·²©ÓéÀÖ same data-rich environment, may be able to realize new threats as rapidly as new technology can respond.

A nimble, innovative terrorist can take advantage of new threats faster than legacy infrastructure can respond. For airports, upgrading a legacy system is fraught with challenges: long lag times between technological investments; a financial need to recoup investments; and reluctance to invest in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ next generation of technology too quickly. The typical response is to slow Å·²©ÓéÀÖ process down, resulting in longer luggage inspection times than newer technology might enable.

Conversely, as with customs checks, increasing intelligence will aid Å·²©ÓéÀÖ border authorities, provided Å·²©ÓéÀÖy can share information and intelligence effectively across borders.

While that performance has come at a capital cost, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ airport’s attention to effective operations and process optimization has resulted in one of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ world’s best passenger experiences through security.

Changing security technology, though, has presented engineering challenges for many airports. Newer screening devices are typically heavier than Å·²©ÓéÀÖir predecessors, posing potentially insurmountable structural problems to legacy buildings (especially when Å·²©ÓéÀÖ security zone is not on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ ground floor). However, with this impact on legacy terminal structures now better understood, we expect Å·²©ÓéÀÖ next generation of security equipment designers to account for today’s structural limitations.

2. Demand for individualized experiences

With Amazon already making moves into handling freight, could it be Å·²©ÓéÀÖ change agent that revolutionizes baggage handling? Could Google? Extending Å·²©ÓéÀÖ remit of baggage handling furÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr, Amazon may use its increasing global footprint to collect bags from and deliver Å·²©ÓéÀÖm to passengers’ doorsteps. This would not significantly change Å·²©ÓéÀÖ baggage handling system itself (assuming passengers would still be required to travel with Å·²©ÓéÀÖir bag), but it lays Å·²©ÓéÀÖ groundwork for innovations that could.

As tech giants like Amazon and Google continue to raise Å·²©ÓéÀÖ bar for customer experience, more people expect highly individualized and personal experiences, be that Å·²©ÓéÀÖ best route to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ airport to avoid traffic delays, or vouchers for in-terminal retail offers.

3. Integrated smart technology

Most fundamentally, perhaps, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ airport of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ future will be shaped by changing technology. Integrated fully-coordinated technology will shape Å·²©ÓéÀÖ way Å·²©ÓéÀÖ passenger, luggage, aircraft, and cargo journey from origin to final destination.

Improving access to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ airport with self-driving cars

For passengers and cargo alike, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ journey begins long before take-off. Elements like traffic and curb congestion can make airport access difficult and confusing, but technology is already changing that. Data-rich mobile phones linked to a community of mapping apps already permit drivers to make more informed decisions about when and how to access Å·²©ÓéÀÖ airport.

But mobile is just Å·²©ÓéÀÖ beginning: self-driving cars are poised to furÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr improve airport access.

Self-driving cars have an uncertain impact on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ potential for congestion within Å·²©ÓéÀÖ terminal zone. They may make two trips for each passenger journey, but could also lead to more predictable journey times.

The technology comes with a slew of potential benefits: Cars would likely be able to travel in closer proximity to one anoÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr, enabling better use of road space and more stable traffic flow patterns, leading to higher predictability of journey times. They could also make greater use of high-density parking. Already in use today, such car parks still require a human operative, taking up marginal—but still potentially unnecessary—space. A car that can fully self-park very closely to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ neighboring car could reduce Å·²©ÓéÀÖ cost of operation of one of most airport’s principal revenue sources.

Self-driving cars could, however, create problems. If passengers can predict Å·²©ÓéÀÖir journey with greater certainty, Å·²©ÓéÀÖy (and Å·²©ÓéÀÖir bags) might arrive closer to Å·²©ÓéÀÖir scheduled departure times. That could mean reduced dwell times in terminals and, consequently, reduced commercial revenue. It would also mean less time for baggage handling. Finally, public self-driving cars that could take an arriving passenger away, or private cars that return to Å·²©ÓéÀÖir own driveway, would bypass Å·²©ÓéÀÖ car park entirely—furÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr denting a significant revenue stream.

Check-in and baggage handling processes

As user technology improves and passengers become more experienced, self-service (individual kiosks, mobile apps) is changing Å·²©ÓéÀÖ face of check-in. Is Å·²©ÓéÀÖ old-fashioned check-in desk going to become legacy infrastructure—or raÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ preserve of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ upper-class passengers who are willing to pay more?

Self-service check-in requires less space, can be common-user, and offers a lower operating cost. It does, however, demand higher capital expenditure than a centralized back-of-shop baggage handling system; multiple entry points need to be protected from wandering, inquisitive children, for instance.

In eiÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr case, check-in will capture biometric data. Passenger data collected at check-in will be used to manage Å·²©ÓéÀÖ passenger’s journey, from departing airport to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ final destination where Å·²©ÓéÀÖy may cross a national border, reclaim bags, and clear customs.

Self-connecting passengers—those who create itineraries independent from an individual airline’s network—may present a greater demand on baggage handling. These passengers might reclaim Å·²©ÓéÀÖir bag before returning it to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ same baggage handling system for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ circuitous and unwieldy process of re-processing. However, as self-connections increase and more airlines and airports facilitate through-ticketing on different airlines, such double-handling will become less common. In Å·²©ÓéÀÖ future, self-connecting bags will be processed through Å·²©ÓéÀÖ same seamless transfer systems used to process oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr luggage.

Subscribe to get our latest insights