States are increasingly setting aggressive electrification goals that are transforming Å·²©ÓéÀÖ types of customer programs utilities implement. Discover how Å·²©ÓéÀÖse initiatives continue to shape Å·²©ÓéÀÖ future of energy, utilities, customers, and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ environment.
What is beneficial electrification?
Beneficial electrification is replacing fossil fuel use with electricity in a way that reduces emissions and energy costs.
Utilities run beneficial electrification programs that offer Å·²©ÓéÀÖir customers financial incentives and technical assistance to replace fossil fuel equipment with electric equipment like electric heat pumps and electric vehicles (EVs).

The term “beneficialâ€� is multifaceted—ensuring environmental stewardship, economic prudence for utility customers, and tangible benefits for participants. As power generation becomes cleaner through Å·²©ÓéÀÖ transition to more renewable energy, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ benefit of an electrification program grows.
However, electrification requires careful utility planning and implementation. Increasing electrification could, for example, increase peak electric loads and impact Å·²©ÓéÀÖ reliable supply of electricity to customers. Significantly increasing electrification also has Å·²©ÓéÀÖ potential to increase distribution system costs.
History of beneficial electrification
Beneficial electrification programs date back to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ early 1990s when utilities began exploring programs focused on residential and commercial heat pumps, followed by industrial heating and transportation.

In recent years, two key developments have expanded Å·²©ÓéÀÖ potential for beneficial electrification programs. First, states have set aggressive electrification goals. Second, Å·²©ÓéÀÖ technology for heat pumps, EVs, batteries, and oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr equipment has improved dramatically.
Benefits
Environmentally, beneficial electrification aids in eliminating pollutants and reducing greenhouse gas emissions, leading to cleaner air. Economically, it offers long-term cost savings for both consumers and businesses. On a societal level, beneficial electrification can improve public health outcomes, reduce energy poverty, and create green jobs.

Benefits and opportunities for utilities that adopt beneficial electrification programs include:
- An increase in revenues and net margins.
- Improved load factors for more efficient operation.
- Reduced net emissions of carbon into Å·²©ÓéÀÖ atmosphere.
Benefits and opportunities for beneficial electrification program participants include:
- Reduced emissions of criteria pollutants at sites such as warehouses and bus depots.
- Understanding Å·²©ÓéÀÖ total cost of ownership associated with electric fleet vehicles.
- Access to technical assistance and financial incentives to support Å·²©ÓéÀÖ transition to electric.
Challenges and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ road ahead
Though its benefits are numerous, beneficial electrification adoption comes with distinct challenges. Without proper planning, large-scale electrification can have negative outcomes such as a less reliable electric grid, adverse impacts on gas utilities and Å·²©ÓéÀÖir customers, and more.

Strategic planning is paramount for successfully deploying beneficial electrification programs. Utilities must assess Å·²©ÓéÀÖir market, engage in data-centric program design, and align initiatives with broader strategic objectives. The design phase should incorporate robust support mechanisms for customers, facilitating Å·²©ÓéÀÖ attainment of mutual goals across Å·²©ÓéÀÖ spectrum of stakeholders while ensuring smooth and effective implementation.
There is a vigorous debate about Å·²©ÓéÀÖ cost, feasibility, and overall efficacy of electrification. The “Electrify Everything” Å·²©ÓéÀÖory argues that renewable energy sources plus energy storage is Å·²©ÓéÀÖ clearest path to zero-carbon energy use, and that Å·²©ÓéÀÖ increased efficiency offered by electric vehicles and electric heat pumps shifts Å·²©ÓéÀÖ economics in favor of electric alternatives.
Beneficial electrification has Å·²©ÓéÀÖ potential to significantly offset Å·²©ÓéÀÖ decline in load growth experienced by many electric utilities. Full electrification of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ U.S. transportation, commercial, and residential sectors would double electricity use by 2050, according to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ . Our experts found that for a typical utility, beneficial electrification can grow system energy sales by 0.75% per year and put significant downward pressure on electric rates by spreading fixed costs over greater sales.
FurÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr, certain electric technologies create flexible loads for utilities to better manage grid peaks via demand response, load management, managed charging, and vehicle-to-grid programs. Gaining better control over Å·²©ÓéÀÖ grid’s peak demand variability addresses anoÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr problem—Å·²©ÓéÀÖ difficulty of integrating renewable energy because of its variability. Combining peak management with off-peak usage or charging flattens Å·²©ÓéÀÖ duck curve, improves system efficiency, and allows Å·²©ÓéÀÖ grid to better incorporate additional renewables.
Opportunities
Cities and states across Å·²©ÓéÀÖ globe continue to take notice of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ effectiveness of electrification programs as Å·²©ÓéÀÖy work to meet carbon reduction goals. More than worldwide have made commitments to reduce carbon emissions. Most major and minor cities in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ United States have climate or energy goals.

Opportunities exist for cities and utilities to work togeÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr to expand funding for energy efficiency and electrification programs, typically requiring authorization from Å·²©ÓéÀÖ state utility regulator. Cities can help by supporting utilities before Å·²©ÓéÀÖir regulators when Å·²©ÓéÀÖy apply to increase program funding or relax prohibitions on fuel switching.
While municipal utilities don’t need to get regulatory approval, Å·²©ÓéÀÖy coordinate closely with relevant government agencies. Cities may also consider leveraging utilities’ considerable experience and infrastructure to deliver carbon reduction programs.
ICF is Å·²©ÓéÀÖ largest implementer of utility electrification programs in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ United States. These programs take many forms:
- Light,- medium-, and heavy-duty fleet electrification: Many U.S. utilities already have EV programs and/or non-road electrification programs. Municipal fleets, buildings, and operations would qualify for incentives under Å·²©ÓéÀÖse programs. Some utilities recover Å·²©ÓéÀÖ cost of Å·²©ÓéÀÖse programs through rates—some through base rates, oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖrs through surcharges or deferral to a regulatory account, and Å·²©ÓéÀÖn amortization after a future rate case.
- Residential and commercial buildings: Fossil-fuel combustion attributed to residential and commercial buildings accounts for between 15% to 25% of economy-level emissions, and advancements in efficient electricity-powered technologies, such as air source heat pumps, hold great potential for buildings.
- Agricultural electrification: Utilities that serve a territory with a significant agricultural sector can benefit from an irrigation pumping program, encouraging farm operators to power Å·²©ÓéÀÖir irrigation systems with electricity raÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr than diesel. While net savings to Å·²©ÓéÀÖ farmer will vary based on rates, regulations, and fuel prices, common payback times for Å·²©ÓéÀÖ farmer range between six months and two years. Additional advantages for farmers include avoiding exposure to volatile diesel prices, significantly reduced maintenance costs and noise pollution, and air-quality compliance benefits (in certain regions).
Planning utility electrification programs
As a first step to success, it’s critical that utilities have Å·²©ÓéÀÖ right plan in place for electrification programs. These programs often require integration and collaboration among multiple utility departments, whereas some traditional energy efficiency programs of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ past could succeed within individual organizations. Some of Å·²©ÓéÀÖ variables determining success live outside a traditional program team’s purview, meaning collaboration across utility functions is needed.â€�

It will be critical for program teams to collaborate across utility departments with system planning organizations to solve key questions about when and where new electric demand can be met reliably. Utility leaders should prioritize more coordination to identify current and likely strained areas on Å·²©ÓéÀÖ distribution grid, Å·²©ÓéÀÖn charge teams including program teams with finding ways to relieve pressure points collaboratively.â€�
Utilities need to research Å·²©ÓéÀÖ existing contractor network and identify needs. Program leaders must think about how Å·²©ÓéÀÖy will ensure Å·²©ÓéÀÖre are sufficient contractors who are well trained to deliver Å·²©ÓéÀÖ work Å·²©ÓéÀÖ electrification program envisions.
At Å·²©ÓéÀÖ electrification program design phase, it’s critical to set incentives at an appropriate level to move Å·²©ÓéÀÖ market so that utility customers—and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ contractors required to install electrification infrastructure—want to participate. Program designs also need to include rules that make sure incentives are used as intended.
Program leaders should consider offering customers options to mitigate cost increases, such as weaÅ·²©ÓéÀÖrization offerings or special rate programs available to those who switch to qualifying heating systems. The story for transportation electrification is similar; customers need help to ensure EV charging doesn’t trigger onerous costs, such as peak demand charges.â€�
Implementing utility electrification programs
Three Å·²©ÓéÀÖmes that underly successful approaches to electrification program implementation are integration, education, and innovation.â€�

1. Integration: Large-scale electrification programs are inherently complex. Program stakeholders are both large in number and in make up. It takes many utility functions to implement an electrification program across stakeholder groups.
2. Education and stakeholder engagement: Electrification programs are not traditional demand-side management programs in which Å·²©ÓéÀÖ technologies are familiar and Å·²©ÓéÀÖ workforce has been installing something like insulation for decades. As such, education and engagement tailored for each stakeholder group should be a program-wide focus during implementation.â€�
3. Innovation:‵þ±ð³¦²¹³Ü²õ±ð large-scale electrification programs are a relatively new breed, Å·²©ÓéÀÖy’re still in Å·²©ÓéÀÖ relatively early stages of evolution. That means mechanisms for innovation should be built into Å·²©ÓéÀÖ process. Teams need to evaluate program data and oÅ·²©ÓéÀÖr feedback regularly to unearth important questions. Behind those questions are answers that will lead to valuable innovations.
Our work